Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use case: multi-asset licensing #138

Open
muttoni opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Use case: multi-asset licensing #138

muttoni opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@muttoni
Copy link

muttoni commented Apr 26, 2024

Description and context

Multi asset licensing use cases:

  • It’s common to want to / or have to license multiple assets as a bundle, rather than individually. E.g. I may not want to license a single character, but I may want to license the whole suite of characters from a series. Would the licensor need to create a new IP to represent the group? How would the relation look like?
  • As an NFT collection, I may want to license the whole collection for specific use-cases and retain specific rights, despite each NFT being registered individually. I imagine this just means the collection has to be an IPA and the NFTs are derivatives of the collection - right?
  • As a licensee, I may demand or want to negotiate a better deal if I license multiple individually registered (not licensed) IPAs. How do we enable that?

Suggested solution

SPG?

Definition of done

Clear recommendation or natively supported method for licensing multiple IP assets as a bundle.

@muttoni muttoni added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant