👷 Add macOS platform to binary release workflow

[aaronleopold]

This builds off of the work from #369 to close #310

I'll try to test it during the week with some debug commits to trigger the workflow before merging this in

[JMicheli]

Looks good to me!

One thing I'm not familiar with in the MacOS context - do you need two binaries, one for Apple Silicon and one for non-Apple hardware?

[aaronleopold]

One thing I'm not familiar with in the MacOS context - do you need two binaries, one for Apple Silicon and one for non-Apple hardware?

Ah yeah, I think you're correct. I'll look more into it this week to see how much would change. It might just be a matter of adding an additional matrix for arm macOS vs intel. I'd rather not mess around with cross compilation if I can help it

[aaronleopold]

Just because I find it interesting, the builds completed in the following order:

• macOS (ARM) 11m 32s
• Ubuntu 13m 20s
• macOS (intel) 15m 17s
• Windows 24m 1s

[DieselTech]

Interesting but weird at the same time. Then again rustup on windows is a bit jank.

[aaronleopold]

Just verified the arm binary worked as expected, so I reverted the debug commit to trigger the workflow and I'll merge this momentarily. Thanks for the catch @JMicheli!