You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am running unsteady simulations within SU2 for compressible flow over a cone. I am not entirely sure I understand the unsteady CFL number within the code.
I want to maintain a certain maximum unsteady CFL number within the domain and based on that compute a global time-step. I want to keep the unsteady CFL number < 1 so I use an explicit scheme. When I specify unsteady CFL number to be 0.8 I get a ridiculously small time-step of 1e-13 order. At the same time, the solver runs just fine with unsteady CFL of 10 (mind I am using an explicit time marching scheme). My back of the envelope calculations indicate that the time-step size for my mesh/free-stream conditions at unsteady CFL 0.8 should be about of order 1e-9.
Has anyone experienced such problems with incredibly low time-steps computed for the unsteady CFL number in the past?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi,
I am running unsteady simulations within SU2 for compressible flow over a cone. I am not entirely sure I understand the unsteady CFL number within the code.
I want to maintain a certain maximum unsteady CFL number within the domain and based on that compute a global time-step. I want to keep the unsteady CFL number
< 1
so I use an explicit scheme. When I specify unsteady CFL number to be0.8
I get a ridiculously small time-step of1e-13
order. At the same time, the solver runs just fine with unsteady CFL of10
(mind I am using an explicit time marching scheme). My back of the envelope calculations indicate that the time-step size for my mesh/free-stream conditions at unsteady CFL0.8
should be about of order1e-9
.Has anyone experienced such problems with incredibly low time-steps computed for the unsteady CFL number in the past?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions