You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently each dependency is stored as its own variable in context. It was simple enough but it growed a little and it is not easy to distinguish the ones for bireli, backend or frontend.
New variables _backend_stack and _frontend_stack have been added to resolve this but this not efficient.
A new simpler way have to be done. The best is just to replace current variables with a one for bireli, another for backend and one for frontend.
A search in template(s) for current variables have to be done before to replace them with their new names.
This should results to something like:
"_backend_stack": {
"python": ">=3.10",
}
And in template files we would use it like {{ cookiecutter._backend_stack.python }}.
Finally, current sphinx directive to output the stack will have to be modified to work with this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently each dependency is stored as its own variable in context. It was simple enough but it growed a little and it is not easy to distinguish the ones for bireli, backend or frontend.
New variables _backend_stack and _frontend_stack have been added to resolve this but this not efficient.
A new simpler way have to be done. The best is just to replace current variables with a one for bireli, another for backend and one for frontend.
A search in template(s) for current variables have to be done before to replace them with their new names.
This should results to something like:
And in template files we would use it like
{{ cookiecutter._backend_stack.python }}
.Finally, current sphinx directive to output the stack will have to be modified to work with this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: