Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(taiko-client): integrate ProverSet in client #17253

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
May 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

davidtaikocha
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@dantaik dantaik changed the base branch from main to prover_set2 May 20, 2024 05:23
Base automatically changed from prover_set2 to main May 20, 2024 10:05
Copy link

openzeppelin-code bot commented May 20, 2024

feat(taiko-client): integrate ProverSet in client

Generated at commit: c3e6859d26726b98260288bf9ab109b8be446325

🚨 Report Summary

Severity Level Results
Contracts Critical
High
Medium
Low
Note
Total
2
2
0
8
41
53
Dependencies Critical
High
Medium
Low
Note
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0

For more details view the full report in OpenZeppelin Code Inspector

@davidtaikocha davidtaikocha changed the base branch from main to deploy-prover-set May 20, 2024 14:51
@davidtaikocha davidtaikocha changed the base branch from deploy-prover-set to main May 20, 2024 14:52
@davidtaikocha davidtaikocha marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2024 16:35
@davidtaikocha davidtaikocha added this pull request to the merge queue May 21, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit f086850 May 21, 2024
5 checks passed
@davidtaikocha davidtaikocha deleted the prover-set-client branch May 21, 2024 02:40
davidtaikocha added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
Co-authored-by: Daniel Wang <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Wang <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dantaik <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gavin Yu <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants