-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
_link_ doesn't work as expected for joined resources in tables #14
Comments
Should we also consider allowing {
"fieldName":"fooLink",
"value":"_link_"
} to be functionally equivalent to: {
"fieldName":"fooLink",
"predicates":[""],
"value":"_link_"
} |
I'm not sure I'm familiar enough with tripod to answer that. The current behavior, as I understand it, is that "predicates" is always required. It seems like you're satisfying that requirement by supplying a "value". What happens if "value" is something other than "link"? |
That said, this conversation seems more appropriate for #15. This issue is really just to align table spec behavior with search spec behavior. |
Wherever fixed, |
Can this be closed? |
If your tablespec has something like:
"fooLink" will be populated from barCollection._id.r
In searchDocument, it appears that it would correctly populate fooLink from fooCollection._id.r
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: