Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Linked Server Support #735

Open
marktshaw opened this issue Apr 30, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Linked Server Support #735

marktshaw opened this issue Apr 30, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement feature-planned feature-request Fix in current PR A PR waiting to be merged for this issue's fix Follow up Recent question asked by tedious members for old issues or discussion that requires member input

Comments

@marktshaw
Copy link

marktshaw commented Apr 30, 2018

We have been spending a ton of cycles trying to execute legacy procedures that internally call linked servers and we have had zero luck. Calls to procedures without linked servers work great. Before we throw in the towel on this tech we figured we would reach out to the community to sanity check a few things.

  • Dev Environment is Win 10, VS Code, Ubuntu Terminal
  • Prod Environment is Linux, Kubernetes
  • Behavior is the same across all environments (calls to procs with linked servers fail but procs without linked servers work)
  • Sql Server version is 2012 on Windows

The error we are seeing is: "Login failed for user 'NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGIN'

  • Are delegated calls to linked servers supported?
  • Is there any guideance that we can refer to?
@Suraiya-Hameed
Copy link
Member

Hey @marktshaw, tedious doesn't support delegated authentication. We have an implementation for Kerberos authentication (it's in queue, depends on PR #624 making its way into master), it can be extended to support delegated authentication, that would fix this issue.

@drc-schihak
Copy link

I'm really excited about the possibility of tedious supporting Linked servers in some way. Hopefully this finishes soon

@IanChokS IanChokS added enhancement Follow up Recent question asked by tedious members for old issues or discussion that requires member input feature-planned Fix in current PR A PR waiting to be merged for this issue's fix labels Dec 13, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement feature-planned feature-request Fix in current PR A PR waiting to be merged for this issue's fix Follow up Recent question asked by tedious members for old issues or discussion that requires member input
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants