Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why pose GT you provided differ from KITTI site? #149

Open
murraiya opened this issue Feb 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Why pose GT you provided differ from KITTI site? #149

murraiya opened this issue Feb 29, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@murraiya
Copy link

murraiya commented Feb 29, 2024

Hi I am a newbie in this field and trying to run SfMLearner.
Your job is incredible.
Thank you for sharing code.

I have two question.

  1. I checked out KITTI odom pose GT is differ from your GT provided in eval section. Can you explain why? Is this involved with coordinate system or sth?
  2. I evaluated my trained model with your GT and got ATE: 0.013, std:0.0098 which is better than in paper. Did I do something wrong? + I am working out but I can't understand how depth involves in pose net.

Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant