You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, we treat quantiles in the inverse transforms the same way as the target series. When using differentiation (DifferencingTransform) this might result in very wide and not meaningful intervals.
Mainly, this affects cases when the expected value of $\large r_t = y_t - y_{t - 1}$ distributed near 0 or when $\large r_t$ has a large enough variance. So upper and lower quantilies of $\large r_t$ are mainly one signed throughout the time.
Implement interface for separate treatment of quantiles in transforms.
Use $\large Q_{y_t}(p) = y_{t - 1} + Q_{r_t}(p)$ to recompute target quantiles in inverse transform of DifferencingTransform, where $\large Q_x(p)$ is p-quantile of the $x$ random variable.
Test cases
No response
Additional context
Here is a comparison between current and proposed approaches.
🚀 Feature Request
Currently, we treat quantiles in the inverse transforms the same way as the target series. When using differentiation (
DifferencingTransform
) this might result in very wide and not meaningful intervals.Mainly, this affects cases when the expected value of$\large r_t = y_t - y_{t - 1}$ distributed near 0 or when $\large r_t$ has a large enough variance. So upper and lower quantilies of $\large r_t$ are mainly one signed throughout the time.
Code to reproduce
Proposal
Implement interface for separate treatment of quantiles in transforms.$\large Q_{y_t}(p) = y_{t - 1} + Q_{r_t}(p)$ to recompute target quantiles in inverse transform of $\large Q_x(p)$ is p-quantile of the $x$ random variable.
Use
DifferencingTransform
, whereTest cases
No response
Additional context
Here is a comparison between current and proposed approaches.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: