We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
对比采用kvass分片和原生promethues不分片的采集数,不管用scrape_samples_scraped还是rate(prometheus_remote_storage_samples_in_total[5m]),发现kvass的结果值总是比原生不分片的prometheus要小,让人感觉是不是少了。。请问这个该怎么确认
scrape_samples_scraped
rate(prometheus_remote_storage_samples_in_total[5m])
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
您可以检查一下targets是不是少了。如果没有少就是正常的。kvass以target为单位调度的。不会出现一个target部分数据有而部分没有的情况的。
Sorry, something went wrong.
我也有这个困惑,所以加了这几个指标,方便统计和排查问题 #86
No branches or pull requests
对比采用kvass分片和原生promethues不分片的采集数,不管用
scrape_samples_scraped
还是rate(prometheus_remote_storage_samples_in_total[5m])
,发现kvass的结果值总是比原生不分片的prometheus要小,让人感觉是不是少了。。请问这个该怎么确认The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: