-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
toml_edit
: value is not written if table is constructed beforehand
#762
Comments
I've updated the reproduction case to make it easier to follow #!/usr/bin/env nargo
---
[dependencies]
toml_edit = "0.22"
---
use toml_edit::{DocumentMut, value};
fn main() {
let toml = "";
let mut doc = toml.parse::<DocumentMut>().expect("invalid doc");
doc["tool"]["typst-test"]["tests"] = value("tests");
println!("doc: \n{}\n", doc.to_string());
let toml = "";
let mut doc = toml.parse::<DocumentMut>().expect("invalid doc");
doc["tool"] = toml_edit::table();
doc["tool"]["typst-test"]["tests"] = value("tests");
println!("doc: \n{}\n", doc.to_string());
let toml = "";
let mut doc = toml.parse::<DocumentMut>().expect("invalid doc");
doc["tool"]["typst-test"] = toml_edit::table();
doc["tool"]["typst-test"]["tests"] = value("tests");
println!("doc: \n{}\n", doc.to_string());
let toml = "";
let mut doc = toml.parse::<DocumentMut>().expect("invalid doc");
doc["tool"] = toml_edit::table();
doc["tool"]["typst-test"] = toml_edit::table();
doc["tool"]["typst-test"]["tests"] = value("tests");
println!("doc: \n{}\n", doc.to_string());
} $ ./toml_edit-762.rs
warning: `package.edition` is unspecified, defaulting to `2021`
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.05s
Running `/home/epage/.cargo/target/84/93c6f0d3e9e9a2/debug/toml_edit-762`
doc:
tool = { typst-test = { tests = "tests" } }
doc:
[tool]
typst-test = { tests = "tests" }
doc:
tool = {}
doc:
[tool]
[tool.typst-test]
tests = "tests" |
To understand whats going on, I'm going to show the debug repr [/home/epage/.cargo/target/84/93c6f0d3e9e9a2/toml_edit-762.rs:25:5] &doc = DocumentMut {
root: Table(
Table {
decor: Decor {
prefix: "default",
suffix: "default",
},
implicit: false,
dotted: false,
doc_position: None,
span: None,
items: {
"tool": TableKeyValue {
key: Key {
key: "tool",
repr: None,
leaf_decor: Decor {
prefix: "default",
suffix: "default",
},
dotted_decor: Decor {
prefix: "default",
suffix: "default",
},
},
value: Value(
InlineTable(
InlineTable {
preamble: empty,
implicit: false,
decor: Decor {
prefix: "default",
suffix: "default",
},
span: None,
dotted: false,
items: {
"typst-test": TableKeyValue {
key: Key {
key: "typst-test",
repr: None,
leaf_decor: Decor {
prefix: "default",
suffix: "default",
},
dotted_decor: Decor {
prefix: "default",
suffix: "default",
},
},
value: Table(
Table {
decor: Decor {
prefix: "default",
suffix: "default",
},
implicit: false,
dotted: false,
doc_position: None,
span: None,
items: {
"tests": TableKeyValue {
key: Key {
key: "tests",
repr: None,
leaf_decor: Decor {
prefix: "default",
suffix: "default",
},
dotted_decor: Decor {
prefix: "default",
suffix: "default",
},
},
value: Value(
String(
Formatted {
value: "tests",
repr: "default",
decor: Decor {
prefix: "default",
suffix: "default",
},
},
),
),
},
},
},
),
},
},
},
),
),
},
},
},
),
trailing: empty,
}
|
Unsure how well this is documented (I wanted to do the above before confirming) but doc["tool"]["typst-test"]["tests"] = value("tests"); always produces inline tables for the intermediate tables and its left to the caller to put in standard tables, correctly, if they want that. The question is what we should do moving forward
|
I think that's the part that confused me when I initially used it (it makes somewhat sense in hindsight). An assertion seems like the best option to me, implicit conversion could cause problems elsewhere and be even more confusing, and leaving it as is, just seems wrong. It should definitely not swallow whatever I put in there without warning. |
Created a test case #[test]
fn table_under_inline() {
let mut doc = DocumentMut::new();
doc["tool"]["typst-test"] = table();
doc["tool"]["typst-test"]["tests"] = value("tests");
assert_data_eq!(doc.to_string(), str![[r#"
tool = {}
"#]]);
} Another approach is we switch from creating inline tables implicitly to we create |
The following code simply discards the last write to the
tests
sub-key.Produces the following output:
Uncommenting the second line produces:
tool = {}
Uncommenting the second and first line produces:
When inspecting the table
tool.typst-test
, the value exists, it's simply not written.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: