Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FFT analysis problem with respiratory data #280

Open
olympia83 opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

FFT analysis problem with respiratory data #280

olympia83 opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
physio Issues related to PhysIO Toolbox

Comments

@olympia83
Copy link

Hi!
We are currently performing an FFT analysis on our fMRI data, with a particular focus on consciousness in participants exhibiting varying levels of arousal (sleep deprived and sedated) . We would like to incorporate respiratory rate, volume, and depth into our analysis.
We have been utilizing the PhysIO toolbox in SPM, following the approach outlined by Kasper et al. While the documentation indicates that respiration should be included (with three regressors in addition to HR x CRF), we are not observing these components in our output graphs. We are encountering some challenges there.
Any advice or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you very much for your time and assistance.

@mrikasper
Copy link
Member

mrikasper commented Aug 27, 2024

Dear @olympia83,

Would you be able to provide some output plots from the toolbox, for example the "Diagnostics plot", please?

Also, when you say that you didn't observe components in the output graphs, are you referring to the fact that the regressors were not created or that the F-contrasts including those regressors didn't not show any significant voxels (e.g., when using tapas_physio_report_contrasts)?

Thank you!
Lars

@mrikasper mrikasper self-assigned this Aug 27, 2024
@mrikasper mrikasper added the physio Issues related to PhysIO Toolbox label Aug 27, 2024
@olympia83
Copy link
Author

olympia83 commented Aug 28, 2024

Thanks a lot for you answer. I am attaching the figure. Should we have to get three more regressors after HR x CRF or is it ok as it is?
figures_09
Thanks a lot!
/Olympia

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
physio Issues related to PhysIO Toolbox
Projects
Status: To do
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants