You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 24, 2022. It is now read-only.
The bulk of Haskell frontend projects today use GHCJS, which basically requires Nix to work. If this project had Nix support (instead of/in addition to the Docker image), it would be much easier to adopt. For many of us in production frontend Haskell space, the absence of a Nix expression for this compiler makes adoption prohibitively difficult.
I would personally prefer using Asterius for WASM to WebGHC, but I can't plausibility do that if the build path is Docker. Additionally if a version jsaddle-wasm was added for Asterius it would further speed up adoption.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was just about to play with asterius, and was surprised to see that nix is not the (or at least one) official way to build it… so supporting this suggestion.
It looks like Asterius has got some Nix support recently, though I couldn't find any related documentation (the build instructions were not updated yet).
The bulk of Haskell frontend projects today use GHCJS, which basically requires Nix to work. If this project had Nix support (instead of/in addition to the Docker image), it would be much easier to adopt. For many of us in production frontend Haskell space, the absence of a Nix expression for this compiler makes adoption prohibitively difficult.
I would personally prefer using Asterius for WASM to WebGHC, but I can't plausibility do that if the build path is Docker. Additionally if a version jsaddle-wasm was added for Asterius it would further speed up adoption.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: