You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently certain scaladocs (such as Apply) contain a whole bunch of generated methods of various arities. This makes it really tough to find the "core" methods that people are probably interested in. I think that we should move the arity methods (at least for 3 or 4 and above) into a separate scaladoc @groups.
One downside is that methods in groups cannot be linked to. However I think not being able to link to these methods is not going to be a problem, and this probably isn't a hard scala bug to fix, so one of us should just fix it :)
cc @mpilquist who may be the only scala dev I know who is good about using scaladoc groups
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently certain scaladocs (such as Apply) contain a whole bunch of generated methods of various arities. This makes it really tough to find the "core" methods that people are probably interested in. I think that we should move the arity methods (at least for 3 or 4 and above) into a separate scaladoc
@group
s.One downside is that methods in groups cannot be linked to. However I think not being able to link to these methods is not going to be a problem, and this probably isn't a hard scala bug to fix, so one of us should just fix it :)
cc @mpilquist who may be the only scala dev I know who is good about using scaladoc groups
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: