feat: configuration annotations

[gentlementlegen]

Resolves #80

QA: https://github.com/Meniole/ubiquibot-config/commit/7aaa773aaf3eb93ea1bf1e15706bdc20d2c3e988#commitcomment-147051448

Changes

The kernel is now capable to check the validity of a given configuration. On push event, if the commits contain the .github/.ubiquibot-config.yml, the kernel will proceed to verify its content. It does the current checks:

• YAML is properly formed
• YAML is decoded successfully
• plugins are reachable (URL / Action)
• plugin with sends the proper arguments

If any of these checks fail, an annotation is made within the commit, pointing to the faulty line.

Side tasks

• Actions will need a validate-workflow.yml
• Workers will need a /manifest endpoint
• The plugin template should be updated

[0x4007]

Can you explain to me how this works:

plugin with sends the proper arguments

[gentlementlegen]

Can you explain to me how this works:

plugin with sends the proper arguments

For Actions, it triggers a Validate Schema workflow run, like here https://github.com/Meniole/automated-merging/actions/runs/10969158970 and gets a workflow dispatched event in return
For Workers, it sends a POST to /manifest endpoint and gets a JSON as a reponse with eventual errors

[gentlementlegen]

@whilefoo Please let me know if the logic makes sense, I'll be working on the changes required in the plugins if you give it your go.

[whilefoo]

Looks good, just wondering if it would be better for plugin to provide the schema for the with object in the manifest instead of doing the check. This way we could avoid calling a workflow and async stuff. What do you think?

[gentlementlegen]

@whilefoo I thought about it but the dangerous thing is that it would allow for possible code injection, and also in the case of plugins like conversation-rewards it would be a very complex schema to provide, so I didn't think it would be reliable.