-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More chat effects #16368
Comments
For what it's worth, there's also |
Woooow. Thanks a lot @joepie91 . Absolutely amazing! Didn't know about that. There's still a problem with discoverability I guess. Perhaps there should be some tab on the smiley selector for this or sth. like that. |
I think that imperfect discovery could actually be better here, makes it more fun to discover new ones :) But I agree that right now it's completely hidden. Maybe a nice middle ground would be to modify the emoji selector so that it shows a small special marker/icon on emoji that have a chat effect attached to them? That way people can still have the fun of discovering them over time, but there's a visual cue helping them along. |
@joepie91: 100% agree |
I'd think discoverability could be handled by trigering effects on multiple emojis, like you already do. |
What about falling leaves (the brown autumn one)? Or butterflies? Or aliens descending? Or what about a cherry blossom rain for spring season? The firework by the way is awesome. Thank you for that whoever it created. |
Aside form chat effects, could we get :joint: and :weed: somehow? Not animated, just the usual little icons. |
Rain addressed in matrix-org/matrix-react-sdk#7086 |
The product team has decided to not add any more effects beyond the |
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Totally makes sense to me. Just noticed that the shared document is missing the "fireworks" effect. |
ROTFL, can't believe I'm filing this, but: Everyone (me included) loves those chat effects (confetti & snow). This feature alone has probably increased the popularity of Matrix/Element on our user-base by a 1000x ;-) We can't get enough & want more of those - not only 2.
Some proposals:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: