Specify complete VersaTiles stack #18
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
To me it is unclear who the audience for this document is. Is it meant as "this is the state of implementation we want to adhere to" or is it "if you want to build a compatible stack, this is what you need to implement"? I believe we are in need of some sort of roadmap, i don't know if this document is the right fit for that particular need.
This is s a bit moot if we want to provide vector tile sets beyond the scope of OSM/Shortbread, for example vectors of elevation contour lines. I believe what you meant is, "versatiles provides a vector tile layer that is always in the OSM/Shortbread schema", but it reads as "only this one schema is allowed".
The meaning of this is unclear to me. Does it mean "Versatiles Server must always provide an HTTP Interface over a TCP port?" The server layer should also recommend graceful downgrade of compression and encoding, eg deliver gzip or png/jpeg respectively if the client can't handle brotli/webp. Otherwise it makes good sense to me. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have compiled all my experiences with VersaTiles and expanded the specification. So far, we have only specified the container. The extension should also define the complete stack including minimum requirements for the generator, server, network and frontend.
What do you think? /cc @yetzt
https://github.com/versatiles-org/versatiles-spec/blob/v02/v02/readme.md
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions