Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specification status report for TPAC 2019 #381

Closed
LJWatson opened this issue Aug 21, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Specification status report for TPAC 2019 #381

LJWatson opened this issue Aug 21, 2019 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@LJWatson
Copy link

Please can you respond to this comment with a brief specifications status report for the WebApps meeting at TPAC. The report should address the following:

  • What progress has your spec made in the last 12 months?
  • Is anything blocking your spec from moving to CR?
  • If yes, what is your plan to unblock it and do you need any help?
  • What do you want to achieve for your spec in the next two days (of breakout sessions)?

We're tracking these status reports in WebApps issue #19

Thanks.

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

@szager-chromium, looking forward to the update at TPAC... if you can provide any details beforehand that would be greatly appreciated.

@szager-chromium
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry for the delay...

I am scrambling a bit to finish some edits to the spec for settled issues, but that's just mechanical stuff, nothing that requires deliberation. Aside from the V2 proposal, the spec has been very stable for the past 12 months.

Aside from that, I believe the spec to be ready for CR, and I hope to make it official at TPAC. Beyond that, there are a few issues in the tracker which I have marked for discussion at TPAC, including the V2 proposal (which has shipped in chromium):

#380

@zcorpan
Copy link
Member

zcorpan commented Sep 30, 2020

I'd like to discuss these topics, in relation to lazy-loading in HTML:

@zcorpan
Copy link
Member

zcorpan commented Sep 30, 2020

Sorry, wrong issue. Maybe this should be closed? Moving to #435

@miketaylr
Copy link
Member

AFAICT, 2019 already happened. So let's close here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants