You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am seeking clarification on the recommendations for specifying the multiple endpoints of a SPARQL service for its different operations (query, update, graph store) with a dcat:DataService. Although the vocabulary definition of dcat:endpointURL does not impose any cardinality restrictions, it seems to be intended to be used for a single endpoint. Is the creation of multiple dcat:DataService instances for each endpoint the preferred approach, or are there other recommended methods within DCAT for handling this scenario?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@marcelotto this is a question of granularity: Is your intend to manage for each "Operation" a different Data Service?
Consider an OpenAPI specification of a system: That has multiple resources and multiple operations for each resource. If you want to publish this as a catalogue of resources and operations than there will be for each resource a dataset and for each operation a data service. This catalogue organisation can drive to create a website similar to what the OpenAPI specification.
However this granularity is not to be shared as such with the public in a broad data ecosystem: I think the chance it low that people would ask to google search (or chatGPT): give me a dataset for which there is an open Update SPARQL endpoint for a resource A.
In this usecase you will abstract away the indiviual resources and the operations of the API. And thus therefore you end with a Dataservice that points with its endpointURL to the root of the API.
In Open Data Portals such as https://data.europa.eu there is little need for the fine grained expressing. It makes your Dataservice only harder to find. But if you are managing an API platform such a APIGEE then it is critical. So it depends on you target and maybe you need both.
Regarding the question of whether to manage each "operation" as a different Data Service, my intention is actually the opposite. By "operations," I refer to the typical endpoints found in a SPARQL store, including:
I am interested in describing a SPARQL service that hosts a dcat:Catalog, encompassing these endpoints within a single dcat:DataService. However, given that dcat:endpointURL is defined as "the root location or primary endpoint of the service" it seems not straightforward to achieve this with DCAT alone without introducing new properties. I was hoping there might be specific recommendations for this case, especially since SPARQL is also a W3C standard.
Absent such guidance, I might lean towards defining my own properties derived from dcat:endpointURL rather than representing each endpoint as a separate dcat:DataService.
I am seeking clarification on the recommendations for specifying the multiple endpoints of a SPARQL service for its different operations (query, update, graph store) with a
dcat:DataService
. Although the vocabulary definition ofdcat:endpointURL
does not impose any cardinality restrictions, it seems to be intended to be used for a single endpoint. Is the creation of multipledcat:DataService
instances for each endpoint the preferred approach, or are there other recommended methods within DCAT for handling this scenario?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: