-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Usage of "concrete" #362
Comments
Abstract / concrete class terms are widely used in OOP / computer science domain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_(computer_programming)#Abstract_and_concrete I would prefer to keep these terms. Maybe definition can be bit more specific, e.g., "An abstract Sensor base class" and "concrete sensor subclass for a particular sensor type". Alternatively, we can substitute concrete with constructible. |
I was the original someone... so here is my original remark to dontcallmedom...
|
I was contacted by someone who was confused by our usage of "concrete sensor" (which can be read as "sensor for/in concrete" as used in the construction business).
This is compounded by language such "An abstract Sensor base class extended by concrete sensors" whereas it is in fact the APIs that are concrete, not the sensors.
The reporter suggests the following alternative language:
"An abstract Sensor base class extended with a profile for a particular sensor type."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: