Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Considerations for alternative development environments / languages for Web extensions #41

Closed
Techdojo opened this issue Jul 11, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@Techdojo
Copy link

As mentioned in issue #39 - Web development is no longer just dominated by JavaScript.

Whilst Typescript is a valid and viable alternative and easy enough to work with for extension development. It would be useful to enable / document how to provide the necessary bindings so that application developers using languages that offer a javascript as a build target can create web extensions in their language of choice. For instance Dart, Go, Python, Ruby etc.

@Jack-Works
Copy link

They can create binding to the WebExtension API like any other Web API

@dotproto
Copy link
Member

I agree with @Jack-Works's comment. I'm going to close this as a dupe of #39. @Techdojo, if you feel they are separate issue please share some additional information to help clarify the distinction.

@Techdojo
Copy link
Author

@dotproto - happy to close this as dupe of #39

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants