-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 531
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump to xamarin/java.interop/main@1adb7964 #8339
Conversation
d57da20
to
1c39135
Compare
Context: dotnet/android#8339 While testing on dotnet/android#8339, we hit this error (among others, to be addressed later): src/Mono.Android/obj/Debug/net8.0/android-34/mcw/Android.Views.IWindowInsetsController.cs(304,41): error CS0103: The name 'behavior' does not exist in the current context This was caused because of code such as: public partial interface IWindowInsetsController { public unsafe int SystemBarsBehavior { get { const string __id = "getSystemBarsBehavior.()I"; try { var __rm = _members_IWindowInsetsController.InstanceMethods.InvokeAbstractInt32Method (__id, this, null); return __rm; } finally { } } set { const string __id = "setSystemBarsBehavior.(I)V"; try { JniArgumentValue* __args = stackalloc JniArgumentValue [1]; __args [0] = new JniArgumentValue (behavior); _members_IWindowInsetsController.InstanceMethods.InvokeAbstractVoidMethod (__id, this, __args); } finally { } } } } This happened because when emitting the property setter, we need to update the `set*` method's parameter name to be `value` so that the normal property setter body is emitted properly. Update `InterfaceInvokerProperty.cs` so that the parameter name is set to `value`. Update `tests/generator-Tests/Integration-Tests/Interfaces.cs` so that we test interface generation for JavaInterop1. Update `tests/generator-Tests/SupportFiles/*.cs` so that `Interfaces.cs` test output can be compiled. Update `tests/generator-Tests/expected.ji/TestInterface/TestInterface.xml` so that some parameter names for `set*()` methods are *not* already named `value`, to induce the original error. Flush `tests/generator-Tests/expected.ji/TestInterface`.
a5fb605
to
4cc2be9
Compare
#1145) Fixes: #910 Context: bc5bcf4 Context: #858 Consider the Java `java.lang.Runnable` interface: package java.lang; public interface Runnable { void run (); } This is bound as: package Java.Lang; public interface IRunnable : IJavaPeerable { void Run (); } with some slight differences depending on whether we're dealing with .NET Android (`generator --codegen-target=xajavainterop1`) or `src/Java.Base` (`generator --codegen-target=javainterop1`). Now, assume a Java API + corresponding binding which returns a `Runnable` instance: package example; public class Whatever { public static Runnable createRunnable(); } You can invoke `IRunnable.Run()` on the return value: IRunnable r = Whatever.CreateRunnable(); r.Run(); but how does that work? This works via an "interface Invoker", which is a class emitted by `generator` which implements the interface and invokes the interface methods through JNI: internal partial class IRunnableInvoker : Java.Lang.Object, IRunnable { public void Run() => … } Once Upon A Time™, the interface invoker implementation mirrored that of classes: a static `IntPtr` field held the `jmethodID` value, which would be looked up on first-use and cached for subsequent invocations: partial class IRunnableInvoker { static IntPtr id_run; public unsafe void Run() { if (id_run == IntPtr.Zero) id_run = JNIEnv.GetMethodID (class_ref, "run", "()V"); JNIEnv.CallVoidMethod (Handle, id_run, …); } } This approach works until you have interface inheritance and methods which come from inherited interfaces: package android.view; public /* partial */ interface ViewManager { void addView(View view, ViewGroup.LayoutParams params); } public /* partial */ interface WindowManager extends ViewManager { void removeViewImmediate(View view); } This would be bound as: namespace Android.Views; public partial interface IViewManager : IJavaPeerable { void AddView (View view, ViewGroup.LayoutParams @params); } public partial IWindowManager : IViewManager { void RemoveViewImmediate (View view); } internal partial class IWindowManagerInvoker : Java.Lang.Object, IWindowManager { static IntPtr id_addView; public void AddView(View view, ViewGroup.LayoutParams @params) { if (id_addView == IntPtr.Zero) id_run = JNIEnv.GetMethodID (class_ref, "addView", "…"); JNIEnv.CallVoidMethod (Handle, id_addView, …); } } Unfortunately, *invoking* `IViewManager.AddView()` through an `IWindowManagerInvoker` would crash! D/dalvikvm( 6645): GetMethodID: method not found: Landroid/view/WindowManager;.addView:(Landroid/view/View;Landroid/view/ViewGroup$LayoutParams;)V I/MonoDroid( 6645): UNHANDLED EXCEPTION: Java.Lang.NoSuchMethodError: Exception of type 'Java.Lang.NoSuchMethodError' was thrown. I/MonoDroid( 6645): at Android.Runtime.JNIEnv.GetMethodID (intptr,string,string) I/MonoDroid( 6645): at Android.Views.IWindowManagerInvoker.AddView (Android.Views.View,Android.Views.ViewGroup/LayoutParams) I/MonoDroid( 6645): at Mono.Samples.Hello.HelloActivity.OnCreate (Android.OS.Bundle) I/MonoDroid( 6645): at Android.App.Activity.n_OnCreate_Landroid_os_Bundle_ (intptr,intptr,intptr) I/MonoDroid( 6645): at (wrapper dynamic-method) object.ecadbe0b-9124-445e-a498-f351075f6c89 (intptr,intptr,intptr) Interfaces are not classes, and this is one of the places that this is most apparent. Because of this crash, we had to use *instance* `jmethodID` caches: internal partial class IWindowManagerInvoker : Java.Lang.Object, IWindowManager { IntPtr id_addView; public void AddView(View view, ViewGroup.LayoutParams @params) { if (id_addView == IntPtr.Zero) id_run = JNIEnv.GetMethodID (class_ref, "addView", "…"); JNIEnv.CallVoidMethod (Handle, id_addView, …); } } Pro: no more crash! Con: *every different instance* of `IWindowManagerInvoker` needs to separately lookup whatever methods are invoked. There is *some* caching, so repeated calls to `AddView()` on the same instance will hit the cache, but if you obtain a different `IWindowManager` instance, `jmethodID` values will need to be looked up again. This was "fine", until #858 enters the picture: interface invokers were full of Android-isms -- `Android.Runtime.JNIEnv.GetMethodID()`! `JNIEnv.CallVoidMethod()`! -- and thus ***not*** APIs that @jonpryor wished to expose within desktop Java.Base bindings. Enter `generator --lang-features=emit-legacy-interface-invokers`: when *not* specified, interface invokers will now use `JniPeerMembers` for method lookup and invocation, allowing `jmethodID` values to be cached *across* instances. In order to prevent the runtime crash, an interface may have *multiple* `JniPeerMembers` values, one per implemented interface, which is used to invoke methods from that interface. `IWindowManagerInvoker` now becomes: internal partial class IWindowManagerInvoker : Java.Lang.Object, IWindowManager { static readonly JniPeerMembers _members_android_view_ViewManager = …; static readonly JniPeerMembers _members_android_view_WindowManager = …; public void AddView(View view, ViewGroup.LayoutParams @params) { const string __id = "addView.…"; _members_android_view_ViewManager.InstanceMethods.InvokeAbstractVoidMethod (__id, this, …); } public void RemoveViewImmediate(View view) { const string __id = "removeViewImmediate.…"; _members_android_view_WindowManager.InstanceMethods.InvokeAbstractVoidMethod (__id, this, …); } } This has two advantages: 1. More caching! 2. Desktop `Java.Base` binding can now have interface invokers. Update `tests/generator-Tests` expected output. Note: to keep this patch smaller, JavaInterop1 output uses the new pattern, and only *some* XAJavaInterop1 tests use the new pattern. Added [CS0114][0] to `$(NoWarn)` in `Java.Base.csproj` to ignore warnings such as: …/src/Java.Base/obj/Debug-net7.0/mcw/Java.Lang.ICharSequence.cs(195,25): warning CS0114: 'ICharSequenceInvoker.ToString()' hides inherited member 'Object.ToString()'. To make the current member override that implementation, add the override keyword. Otherwise add the new keyword. [Ignoring CS0114 is also done in `Mono.Android.dll` as well][1], so this is not a new or unique requirement. Update `Java.Interop.dll` so that `JniRuntime.JniValueManager.GetActivationConstructor()` now knows about and looks for `*Invoker` types, then uses the activation constructor from the `*Invoker` type when the source type is an abstract `class` or `interface`. Update `tests/Java.Base-Tests` to test for implicit `*Invoker` lookup and invocation support. ~~ Property Setters ~~ While testing on dotnet/android#8339, we hit this error (among others, to be addressed later): src/Mono.Android/obj/Debug/net8.0/android-34/mcw/Android.Views.IWindowInsetsController.cs(304,41): error CS0103: The name 'behavior' does not exist in the current context This was caused because of code such as: public partial interface IWindowInsetsController { public unsafe int SystemBarsBehavior { get { const string __id = "getSystemBarsBehavior.()I"; try { var __rm = _members_IWindowInsetsController.InstanceMethods.InvokeAbstractInt32Method (__id, this, null); return __rm; } finally { } } set { const string __id = "setSystemBarsBehavior.(I)V"; try { JniArgumentValue* __args = stackalloc JniArgumentValue [1]; __args [0] = new JniArgumentValue (behavior); _members_IWindowInsetsController.InstanceMethods.InvokeAbstractVoidMethod (__id, this, __args); } finally { } } } } This happened because when emitting the property setter, we need to update the `set*` method's parameter name to be `value` so that the normal property setter body is emitted properly. Update `InterfaceInvokerProperty.cs` so that the parameter name is set to `value`. ~~ Performance ~~ What does this do for performance? Add a new `InterfaceInvokerTiming` test fixture to `Java.Interop-PerformanceTests.dll`, which: 1. "Reimplements" the "legacy" and "JniPeerMembers" Invoker strategies 2. For each Invoker strategy: a. Invokes a Java method which returns a `java.lang.Runnable` instance b. Invokes `Runnable.run()` on the instance returned by (2.a) …100 times. c. Repeat (2.a) and (2.b) 100 times. The result is that using `JniPeerMembers` is *much* faster: % dotnet build tests/Java.Interop-PerformanceTests/*.csproj && \ dotnet test --logger "console;verbosity=detailed" bin/TestDebug-net7.0/Java.Interop-PerformanceTests.dll --filter "Name~InterfaceInvokerTiming" … Passed InterfaceInvokers [1 s] Standard Output Messages: ## InterfaceInvokers Timing: instanceIds: 00:00:01.1095502 ## InterfaceInvokers Timing: peerMembers: 00:00:00.1400427 Using `JniPeerMembers` takes ~1/8th the time as using `jmethodID`s. TODO: something is *probably* wrong with my test -- reviews welcome! -- as when I increase the (2.b) iteration count, the `peerMembers` time is largely unchanged (~0.14s), while the `instanceIds` time increases linearly. *Something* is wrong there. I'm not sure what. (Or *nothing* is wrong, and instance `jmethodID` are just *that* bad.) [0]: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/misc/cs0114 [1]: https://github.com/xamarin/xamarin-android/blob/d5c4ec09f7658428a10bbe49c8a7a3eb2f71cb86/src/Mono.Android/Mono.Android.csproj#L12C7-L12C7
Fixes: dotnet/java-interop#910 Fixes: dotnet/java-interop#1139 Changes: dotnet/java-interop@3c83179...1adb796 * dotnet/java-interop@1adb7964: [generator] `generator --lang-features=emit-legacy-interface-invokers` (dotnet/java-interop#1145) * dotnet/java-interop@6bd7ae48: [Xamarin.Android.Tools.Bytecode] Kotlin internal prop visibility (dotnet/java-interop#1151) Updates `class-parse` to better support parsing the visibility of Kotlin properties. Updates `generator` to emit optimized interface Invokers. Add support for a new `$(AndroidEmitLegacyInterfaceInvokers)` MSBuild property; when `true`, causes `generator` to emit legacy interface Invokers. The default value is `false`.
4cc2be9
to
f202e3b
Compare
I think we should make Perhaps making it See #6436. Since this one also hasn't been removed, this might bring up a larger point: we should probably maintain a wiki page of planned future deprecations and removals. We have many instances where we add a new mechanism with the intent to remove the old one once we are sure it works fine, and then we never go back and remove the old one. |
As per discussion.
Made |
@jpobst: I think dotnet/java-interop@6bd7ae48 broke the build; the macOS > Tests > APKs .NET > run Xamarin.Android.JcwGen_Tests job is failing to build:
|
The test failures are in UpdateLayoutIdIsIncludedInDesigner(True):
These failures are also present on main, e.g. fff1f4c: https://devdiv.visualstudio.com/DevDiv/_build/results?buildId=8638656&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab&runId=88047634&resultId=100092&paneView=debug Ignoring these failures. |
* main: Bump to xamarin/java.interop/main@38c8a827 (#8339)
Fixes: dotnet/java-interop#910
Fixes: dotnet/java-interop#1139
Changes: dotnet/java-interop@3c83179...1adb796
generator --lang-features=emit-legacy-interface-invokers
([generator]generator --lang-features=emit-legacy-interface-invokers
java-interop#1145)Updates
class-parse
to better support parsing the visibility ofKotlin properties.
Updates
generator
to emit optimized interface Invokers.Add support for a new
$(_AndroidEmitLegacyInterfaceInvokers)
MSBuildproperty; when
true
, causesgenerator
to emit legacy interfaceInvokers. The default value is
false
.