Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can't get the same results as paper #2

Open
lioutasb opened this issue May 3, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Can't get the same results as paper #2

lioutasb opened this issue May 3, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@lioutasb
Copy link

lioutasb commented May 3, 2016

I'm trying to reproduce the results from DAQAUR-REDUCED dataset as mentioned in paper but it seems the model can't get an accuracy above 40% . The paper states an accuracy of 46.2% with SAN(2, LSTM) model. It would be nice if you could upload the pre-processed files from this dataset also and the options you used for training.

Thank you,
Vasilis Lioutas

@zcyang
Copy link
Owner

zcyang commented May 4, 2016

the default configuration is for vqa data set, not the daquar data set. You can directly download the vqa data (the link has been provided) and run the training, this will lead to top-1 (most frequent label or answer) accuracy of >50%, you can then evaluate the metric used for vqa data set, which should be equivalent to the result reported in the paper.

For daquar, you should reduce the model size and increase the dropout ratio to reduce overfitting.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants