Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[feature-wisun] Added configuration for RADIUS retry timer to WisunBorderRouter #13530

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2020
Merged

[feature-wisun] Added configuration for RADIUS retry timer to WisunBorderRouter #13530

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2020

Conversation

mikaleppanen
Copy link

Summary of changes

Added RADIUS client retry trickle timer configuration interface and .json configuration options to WisunBorderRouter class. Interface can be used to set how fast the RADIUS client retries Access-Request messages to RADIUS server in case reply from server is not received.

Impact of changes

None

Migration actions required

None

Documentation

None


Pull request type

[] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[X] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[X] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers

@mikter @artokin

@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

ciarmcom commented Sep 2, 2020

@mikaleppanen, thank you for your changes.
@artokin @mikter @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested review from mikter and a team September 2, 2020 11:00

mesh_error_t WisunBorderRouter::set_bbr_radius_timing(void)
{
int status = ws_bbr_radius_timing_set(_mesh_if_id, (bbr_radius_timing_t *) &_radius_timing);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this structure is modified having the same structure in both interface makes changing of it quite hard

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, true. I removed the dependency.

@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Sep 2, 2020

This PR cannot be merged due to conflicts. Please rebase to resolve them.

@mergify mergify bot removed the needs: review label Sep 2, 2020
@mikaleppanen
Copy link
Author

I'll rebase this.

@mikaleppanen
Copy link
Author

rebased

artokin
artokin previously approved these changes Sep 2, 2020
@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Sep 3, 2020

This PR cannot be merged due to conflicts. Please rebase to resolve them.

@mergify mergify bot removed the needs: CI label Sep 3, 2020
@mikaleppanen
Copy link
Author

rebased

@mergify mergify bot dismissed artokin’s stale review September 3, 2020 09:14

Pull request has been modified.

@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: work labels Sep 3, 2020
@artokin artokin requested a review from 0xc0170 September 3, 2020 10:37
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Sep 3, 2020

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Sep 3, 2020

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 11 of 11 test jobs passed
Build number : 1
Build artifacts

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants