Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add RTC using HSE to target STM32F1 #15034

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2021

Conversation

LukasKarel
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of changes

The clock tree of the STM32F1 allows to use RTC with HSE but this was not possible to configure with the mbed configuration system. This is now added accordingly.

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation

None.


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[x] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers


@LukasKarel LukasKarel changed the title add RTC from HSE to target STM32F1 add RTC using HSE to target STM32F1 Aug 31, 2021
@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Aug 31, 2021
@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested a review from a team August 31, 2021 13:00
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@LukasKarel, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@@ -292,7 +292,11 @@ void mbed_sdk_init()
#if (MBED_CONF_TARGET_RTC_CLOCK_SOURCE == USE_RTC_CLK_HSE)
RCC_PeriphCLKInitTypeDef PeriphClkInitStruct = {0};
PeriphClkInitStruct.PeriphClockSelection = RCC_PERIPHCLK_RTC;
#if (!TARGET_STM32F1)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about:
#if defined(RCC_RTCCLKSOURCE_HSE_DIVX)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about:
#if defined(RCC_RTCCLKSOURCE_HSE_DIVX)

This should work as well. I will change it asap.

@LukasKarel LukasKarel requested review from jeromecoutant and removed request for a team September 1, 2021 06:18
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Sep 1, 2021

Please rebase to the latest master to get github workflow update to fix basic checks

@LukasKarel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@0xc0170 done

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Sep 1, 2021

Ci started

@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: review labels Sep 1, 2021
@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Sep 1, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit ff0e682 into ARMmbed:master Sep 1, 2021
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready for merge label Sep 1, 2021
@mbedmain mbedmain added release-version: 6.15.0 Release-pending and removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Sep 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants