-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
STM32WL : add robustness #15183
STM32WL : add robustness #15183
Conversation
@jeromecoutant, thank you for your changes. |
Can you extend the commit message "add robustness" - where (is this lorawan), also what is this addressing - is there a bug or improvement? |
c966d42
to
51be1d4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also wonder if we should document export
deprecated feature
|
||
## CUSTOM boards | ||
`mbed export -m NUCLEO_WL55JC -i uvision6` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should not be part of this PR neither the commit (not related to the PR ,is it?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's about WL... :-)
I could make 2 commits at least !
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
true lets separate these. Should we however document deprecated features (at least a note there ?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@0xc0170 done
Improvment to support extensive tests
51be1d4
to
e49036d
Compare
Ci started |
Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESSBuild Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & ArtifactsCLICK for Detailed Summary
|
Summary of changes
Sometimes lorawan test was not 100% OK when it is executed many times.
@ludoch-stm
@hallard
Impact of changes
Migration actions required
Documentation
Pull request type
Test results
Reviewers