-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add upgrade-15 (proposal 74) #157
Conversation
0xpatrickdev
commented
May 15, 2024
•
edited
Loading
edited
- closes: Add upgrade-15 to A3P #152
- see https://github.com/Agoric/agoric-sdk/tree/dev-upgrade-15/a3p-integration/proposals/a%3Aupgrade-15
- see https://github.com/Agoric/agoric-sdk/tree/dev-upgrade-15/a3p-integration/proposals/a%3Aupgrade-15 Co-Authored-By: 0xPatrick <[email protected]> Co-Authored-By: Richard Gibson <[email protected]>
Use upgradeInfo from https://ping.pub/agoric/gov/74
CI passes! 🎉 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Note that we don't have Mergify in this repo so the autosquash will have to be performed manually before merge
Fixes #9260 ## Description As of Agoric/agoric-3-proposals#157 , `a3p:latest` now includes results of [upgrade-15](https://github.com/Agoric/agoric-sdk/releases/tag/agoric-upgrade-15). This removes the duplication from the UNRELEASED upgrade handler and a3p-integration. ### Security Considerations n/a ### Scaling Considerations n/a ### Documentation Considerations n/a ### Testing Considerations How much of the [upgrade-15 a3p-integration](https://github.com/Agoric/agoric-sdk/tree/agoric-upgrade-15/a3p-integration/proposals/a%3Aupgrade-15) should remain in [a:upgrade-next](https://github.com/Agoric/agoric-sdk/tree/master/a3p-integration/proposals/a%3Aupgrade-next)? I'm thinking specifically about [exit-reclaim.test.js](https://github.com/Agoric/agoric-sdk/blob/master/a3p-integration/proposals/a%3Aupgrade-next/exit-reclaim.test.js) and associated preparation. ### Upgrade Considerations @Chris-Hibbert Does [initial.test.js](https://github.com/Agoric/agoric-sdk/blob/master/a3p-integration/proposals/a%3Aupgrade-next/initial.test.js) needs some extension for the vaultFactory and/or scaledPriceAuthority upgrades?
What do you think made CI pass? @gibson042 I'm trying to get What is the purpose of making a bad offer from the upgrade? (see Agoric/agoric-sdk@af9e09d) |
Oh I see that checksums did not match => https://github.com/Agoric/agoric-3-proposals/actions/runs/9228100706/job/25391446982#step:10:4997. However, the latter question still remains; What is the purpose of making a bad offer from the upgrade? (see Agoric/agoric-sdk@af9e09d) |
Because the upgrade added a repair for offers in a bad state and it needed such a state in order to confirm the upgrade worked. Agoric/agoric-sdk#9239 |
Yeah, it makes sense now. Thanks! @turadg |