feat: handled unknown dialect for cloud #1450
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
| private async retryOnce() { | ||
| if (this.firstRun) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| this.firstRun = true; | ||
| this.findAdapterType(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mdesmet, should we add a telemetry event for retry and maybe for failure as well?
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to eaaa4c9 in 32 seconds
More details
- Looked at
32lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/dbt_client/dbtCloudIntegration.ts:1078
- Draft comment:
Consider usingawaitwiththis.retryOnce()in the setTimeout callback to ensure asynchronous operations are completed before proceeding. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment suggests a change that is not necessary for the current implementation. ThesetTimeoutfunction is used to delay the execution ofretryOnce, and there is no need to wait for its completion in this context. The suggestion to useawaitis not applicable here, as it would not change the behavior of the code in a meaningful way. The comment does not provide strong evidence of a required code change.
I might be overlooking a scenario where awaitingretryOncecould be beneficial, such as if subsequent code depends on its completion. However, the current context does not indicate such a dependency.
The current implementation does not show any dependency on the completion ofretryOncebefore proceeding. The use ofsetTimeoutis to retry after a delay, and awaiting it would not provide any additional benefit.
Delete the comment as it suggests an unnecessary change. The use ofawaitin this context does not provide any benefit, and the current implementation is sufficient.
2. src/dbt_client/dbtCloudIntegration.ts:1035
- Draft comment:
Add a return type to thefindAdapterTypefunction signature for better clarity and refactoring ease.
private async findAdapterType(): Promise<void> {
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_mJHeoyTJUATS32AR
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| this.firstRun = true; | ||
| this.findAdapterType(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using await with this.findAdapterType() in retryOnce to ensure asynchronous operations are completed before proceeding.
| @@ -1023,6 +1023,15 @@ export class DBTCloudProjectIntegration | |||
| } | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| private firstRun = false; | |||
| private async retryOnce() { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add a return type to the retryOnce function signature for better clarity and refactoring ease.
| private async retryOnce() { | |
| private async retryOnce(): Promise<void> { |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| private firstRun = false; | ||
| private async retryOnce() { | ||
| if (this.firstRun) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| this.firstRun = true; | ||
| this.findAdapterType(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refine the retryOnce method for clarity and correctness
-
The variable
firstRunis used to prevent multiple retries in theretryOncemethod. However, the namefirstRunmay be misleading, as it suggests tracking the first execution of the entire process, whereas it's actually used to ensure that the retry logic occurs only once. Consider renaming it tohasRetriedorretryAttemptedto improve code readability. -
The
retryOncemethod is declared asasync, but it doesn't useawaitwhen callingthis.findAdapterType(). IffindAdapterTypeis an asynchronous function, you might want toawaitits completion to handle any potential errors. Alternatively, if you don't need to wait forfindAdapterType()to complete, consider removing theasynckeyword fromretryOnce.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on fdfa089 in 22 seconds
More details
- Looked at
33lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/dbt_client/dbtCloudIntegration.ts:1036
- Draft comment:
Consider usingawaitwhen callingfindAdapterType()inretryOnce()to ensure the method completes before proceeding. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is suggesting a change that has already been implemented in the code. Theawaitkeyword is already used withfindAdapterType()in theretryOnce()function. Therefore, the comment is not necessary.
I might be missing some context about why the comment was made, but based on the current code, the suggestion is already implemented.
The code clearly shows thatawaitis used, so the comment is redundant regardless of any additional context.
The comment should be deleted because the suggested change is already implemented in the code.
2. src/dbt_client/dbtCloudIntegration.ts:1046
- Draft comment:
Consider usingawaitwhen callingfindAdapterType()inretryOnce()to ensure the method completes before proceeding. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
3. src/dbt_client/dbtCloudIntegration.ts:1046
- Draft comment:
Consider using early returns in thefindAdapterTypefunction to reduce nesting and improve readability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_5aJPw3cXyY1IFCZe
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/dbt_client/dbtCloudIntegration.ts (1)
1031-1044: Good addition of retry mechanism, but consider usingawait.The
retryOncemethod is a good addition to improve the reliability of adapter type detection. The use of a flag to prevent multiple retries is a smart approach.However, since the method is declared as
async, consider usingawaitwhen callingthis.findAdapterType():private async retryOnce() { if (this.firstRun) { return; } this.firstRun = true; const startTime = Date.now(); - this.findAdapterType(); + await this.findAdapterType(); const elapsedTime = Date.now() - startTime; this.telemetry.sendTelemetryEvent("cloudFindAdapterTypeElapsedTime", { elapsedTime: elapsedTime.toString(), retry: "true", }); }This ensures that the timing measurement accurately reflects the duration of
findAdapterType().
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/dbt_client/dbtCloudIntegration.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/dbt_client/dbtCloudIntegration.ts (1)
241-246: LGTM: Improved performance tracking for adapter type detection.The addition of timing measurement for
findAdapterType()is a good improvement. It enhances observability and can help in identifying performance issues related to adapter type detection.
| if (!this.adapterType) { | ||
| setTimeout(() => { | ||
| this.retryOnce(); | ||
| }, 5000); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing the retry mechanism.
The addition of a retry mechanism for adapter type detection is a good improvement for handling transient issues. However, there are a few points to consider:
-
The current implementation might lead to multiple concurrent retries if
findAdapterTypeis called multiple times in quick succession. Consider using a class-level flag to prevent this. -
There's no upper limit on the number of retries, which could lead to infinite retries in case of persistent issues. Consider implementing a maximum retry count.
-
The retry is triggered in the
findAdapterTypemethod, but the actual retry logic is inretryOnce. This separation might make the flow harder to follow.
Here's a suggestion to address these points:
private retryCount = 0;
private readonly MAX_RETRIES = 3;
private isRetrying = false;
private async findAdapterType() {
// ... existing code ...
if (!this.adapterType && this.retryCount < this.MAX_RETRIES && !this.isRetrying) {
this.retryCount++;
this.isRetrying = true;
setTimeout(async () => {
await this.retryOnce();
this.isRetrying = false;
}, 5000);
}
}This approach limits the number of retries, prevents concurrent retries, and keeps the retry logic within the findAdapterType method for better clarity.
Overview
Problem
Describe the problem you are solving. Mention the ticket/issue if applicable.
Solution
Describe the implemented solution. Add external references if needed.
Screenshot/Demo
A picture is worth a thousand words. Please highlight the changes if applicable.
How to test
Checklist
README.mdupdated and added information about my changeImportant
Adds retry mechanism in
DBTCloudProjectIntegrationto handle unknown adapter types by retrying adapter type detection once.retryOnce()method inDBTCloudProjectIntegrationto retry fetching adapter type if unknown.findAdapterType()to callretryOnce()ifadapterTypeis not set.firstRunboolean to ensureretryOnce()is only executed once.findAdapterType()andretryOnce()inDBTCloudProjectIntegration.This description was created by
for fdfa089. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit