Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

upgrade NuGet packages #296

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 18, 2023

Updated version.json to 2.9.9.

6bafd9b
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Merged

upgrade NuGet packages #296

Updated version.json to 2.9.9.
6bafd9b
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Azure Pipelines / Azure-Samples.iot-edge-opc-plc succeeded Sep 18, 2023 in 11m 35s

Build #2.9.9.1+b6e6f3b071 had test failures

0 errors / 0 warnings

Details

Tests

  • Failed: 1 (0.52%)
  • Passed: 191 (99.48%)
  • Other: 0 (0.00%)
  • Total: 192

Annotations

Check failure on line 1 in OpcPlc.Tests.SimulatorNodesTests.Telemetry_ContainsOutlier("DipData",-1000)

See this annotation in the file changed.

@azure-pipelines azure-pipelines / Azure-Samples.iot-edge-opc-plc

OpcPlc.Tests.SimulatorNodesTests.Telemetry_ContainsOutlier("DipData",-1000) 

Expected outlierCount to be greater than 0 because there should be at least a few measurements that were -1000, but found 0.
Raw output 
   at FluentAssertions.Execution.LateBoundTestFramework.Throw(String message)
   at FluentAssertions.Execution.TestFrameworkProvider.Throw(String message)
   at FluentAssertions.Execution.DefaultAssertionStrategy.HandleFailure(String message)
   at FluentAssertions.Execution.AssertionScope.FailWith(Func`1 failReasonFunc)
   at FluentAssertions.Numeric.NumericAssertions`2.BeGreaterThan(T expected, String because, Object[] becauseArgs)
   at OpcPlc.Tests.SimulatorNodesTests.Telemetry_ContainsOutlier(String identifier, Int32 outlierValue) in /Users/runner/work/1/s/tests/SimulatorNodesTests.cs:line 131
View more details on Azure Pipelines