Move to maintained yaml lib #3454
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hawkowl
requested review from
jewzaam,
bennerv,
rogbas,
jharrington22,
cblecker,
cadenmarchese,
UlrichSchlueter,
s-amann,
SudoBrendan,
Shivkumar13,
yjst2012,
jaitaiwan,
anshulvermapatel,
hlipsig,
dofinn and
tiguelu
as code owners
|
/azp run e2e, ci |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
hawkowl
added
size-small
hawkowl
force-pushed
the
hawkowl/yaml-move
branch
from
3fd4033
to
c2bdfb8
Compare
|
/azp run ci, e2e |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
cadenmarchese
approved these changes
Jul 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue this PR addresses:
Splitting out of the work in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ARO-1420
What this PR does / why we need it:
Replaces github.com/ghodss/yaml with the maintained k8s fork.
Test plan for issue:
CI, E2E
Is there any documentation that needs to be updated for this PR?
N/A
How do you know this will function as expected in production?
CI should validate behaviour, plus it is not (much, any?) of an underlying behavioural change.