-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/1password #9980
Feature/1password #9980
Conversation
Okay cool! |
Hello @azurekid, On my test branch, I was looking for the cause for validation failure. Even I tried to replace the code in the data connector with another data connector. We can skip this validation failure but need to discuss this within team whether the validation failure is legit or not OR can it be skipped Thanks and sorry for the delay in response. |
Thanks! I am glad we came to the same conclusion regarding this. Would love to see how we can put a bit more pressure on it so organizations can start to test the preview version and provide us with valuable feedback. @scottisloud for visibility |
Noted @azurekid, Will get this complete soonest |
Thanks @azurekid and @v-prasadboke for all of your hard work to help bring this solution across the finish line. |
Hey, the blog post has been published on Medium, LinkedIn, and a few security communities. People are excited to start testing, but the link in the articles still directs to my personal GitHub. It's been 10 days now, and I think it's time to move forward. Can we escalate this PR? It's been open for months. |
Hello, @azurekid & @scottisloud. You know I have been working on this PR, there is a KQL validation thats throwing an error for null value. But, while investigating the error I did not notice any missing or null values. I submitted a test PR and have been working on it #10536 I'm in connect with Internal resources regarding this KQL failure. I apologize @azurekid and @scottisloud for the inconvenience and delay with this PR. |
Hi @v-prasadboke thanks for the update. I see it's been about a week since #10536 had commits and two days since your post above. We agree we'd prefer to not have a validation error cause trouble in the future, however the ongoing delays here are holding up our ability to deliver a feature to our mutual customers. Do we know the validation failures flagged by your GH workflow are meaningful failures? In our testing we've seen no actual impacts to the behaviour of the solution, despite the errors your workflow flags. We have had to reschedule formal release and marketing a couple times already, and we'd like to avoid further last-minute delays. To that end, is there a chance you could provide us with an approximate ETA for a resolution to the GH workflow issues? That would allow us to anticipate and schedule the release in a way that accommodates your ongoing efforts here. This is not a request to expedite this (though we'd welcome that too), but rather a request for an ETA (regardless of what the ETA is) so we can plan around that ETA. |
Hello @azurekid & @azurekid, The KQL validation is resolved. The function app is new to me. Can we get on a call tomorrow so that I can get an understanding of this function apps working and get this PR merged by tomorrow EOD. I work in IST time zone and my mail id is [email protected] |
Thank you very much! |
Hello @azurekid, Please follow this guidelines for offerid |
just pushed the change to the |
@azurekid maybe you missed on committing the change requested for OfferID. Can you confirm on this once. |
Sorry, pushed it to the wrong branch. |
b73bbc2
to
a48b687
Compare
Change(s):
Alert Rules
Data Connector
1Password_API_FunctionApp.json
Workbooks
Reason for Change(s):
Version Updated:
Testing Completed:
Checked that the validations are passing and have addressed any issues that are present: