-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 494
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added stack trace to CosmosException, ResponseMessage.ErrorMessage includes full exception info. #1213
Merged
Merged
Added stack trace to CosmosException, ResponseMessage.ErrorMessage includes full exception info. #1213
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
27 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d4b9c9c
Removed Error since it is not being used anywhere.
ef9a94b
Removed error since it's not being used
87b363c
Refactored added new exception types
d1406ec
ResponseMessage.ErrorMessage will now return the full CosmosException…
eb37121
Fixed build issue
e8422e3
Renamed exception to add Cosmos to avoid confusion with Document name…
f783e54
Fixed exception handling and updated tests.
61905b1
Fixed tests
23a7a99
Fixed ExceptionWithStackTraceException to use original exception stac…
73d5632
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into users/jawilley/diag…
97fae63
Fixed merge conflicts with latest
968fb97
Added diagnostic context to exceptions.
1162ce1
Fixed test for retail build
32343f2
Updated error message field in linq tests
064c1f5
Converted the stack trace to a string. Removed creating the stack tra…
a41b615
Updated changelog
0d2e970
Removed typed exceptions to avoid exposing internal types.
b5507e0
Merged to latest
74beae5
Adding transport client exception tests.
300872b
Update Microsoft.Azure.Cosmos/src/Resource/CosmosExceptions/CosmosExc…
j82w fce942a
Update Microsoft.Azure.Cosmos/src/Resource/CosmosExceptions/CosmosExc…
j82w 680cb2e
Removed diagnostics from Response.ErrorMessage
c4e9490
Fixed unit test
46d9b1c
Adding Error object to CosmosException for back compatability.
4a72093
Adding unit test for Error handling
cad13c7
Fixed DocumentServiceResponse handling
553a761
Increased EndpointFailureMockTest wait time to avoid transient failures.
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Goodie
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just wonder if this will cause any issue when integrated internally, unless noone else created such an extension with that name
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It shouldn't since it's in the SDK namespace.