Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updated ErrorResponse in DataExport and OperationStatuses #13012

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 23, 2021

Conversation

dabenhamMic
Copy link
Contributor

@dabenhamMic dabenhamMic commented Feb 17, 2021

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When you are targeting to deploy new service/feature to public regions? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  3. When you expect to publish swagger? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  4. If it's an update to existing version, please select SDKs of specific language and CLIs that require refresh after swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No, no need to refresh for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.

    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
    • Adding a new service
  • Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in stable version
  • Removing properties in stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in stable version
  • Updating API in stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @dabenhamMic Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 17, 2021

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️❌BreakingChange: 31 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail] Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'object'.
    New: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/Clusters.json#L69:13
    Old: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/Clusters.json#L69:13
    1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'object'.
    New: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/Clusters.json#L108:13
    Old: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/Clusters.json#L108:13
    1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'object'.
    New: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/Clusters.json#L178:13
    Old: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/Clusters.json#L178:13
    1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'object'.
    New: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/Clusters.json#L223:13
    Old: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/Clusters.json#L223:13
    1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'object'.
    New: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/Clusters.json#L268:13
    Old: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/Clusters.json#L268:13
    1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'object'.
    New: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/Clusters.json#L321:13
    Old: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/Clusters.json#L321:13
    1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'object'.
    New: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/DataExports.json#L72:13
    Old: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/DataExports.json#L72:13
    1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'object'.
    New: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/DataExports.json#L142:13
    Old: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/DataExports.json#L142:13
    1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'object'.
    New: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/DataExports.json#L189:13
    Old: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/DataExports.json#L189:13
    1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type '' than the previous one 'object'.
    New: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/DataExports.json#L236:13
    Old: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-08-01/DataExports.json#L236:13
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ R4030 - UniqueXmsExample Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: Get specific operation status
    Location: Microsoft.OperationalInsights/stable/2020-10-01/Operations.json#L39
    ️⚠️Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ MULTIPLE_API_VERSION The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers.
    readme: specification/operationalinsights/resource-manager/readme.md
    tag: specification/operationalinsights/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2020-10
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation: 143 Warnings warning [Detail] Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"operationalinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2020-10",
    "details":"The schema 'DataExport' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"operationalinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2020-10",
    "details":"The schema 'DataExportListResult' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"operationalinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2020-10",
    "details":"The schema 'DataExportProperties' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"operationalinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2020-10",
    "details":"The schema 'Destination' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"operationalinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2020-10",
    "details":"The schema 'DestinationMetaData' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"operationalinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2020-10",
    "details":"The schema 'DataSource' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"operationalinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2020-10",
    "details":"The schema 'DataSourceFilter' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"operationalinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2020-10",
    "details":"The schema 'DataSourceListResult' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"operationalinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2020-10",
    "details":"The schema 'IntelligencePack' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"operationalinsights/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2020-10",
    "details":"The schema 'LinkedServiceProperties' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 17, 2021

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 33ffbed. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	go run ./tools/generator/main.go ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️operationalinsights/mgmt/2020-10-01/operationalinsights [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      Only show 24 items here, please refer to log for details.
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `StorageInsight`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `StorageInsightConfigsClient`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `StorageInsightListResult`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `StorageInsightListResultIterator`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `StorageInsightListResultPage`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `StorageInsightProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `StorageInsightStatus`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `Table`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `TableProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `TablesClient`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `TablesListResult`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `Tag`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `UsageMetric`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `UsagesClient`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `WorkspaceListManagementGroupsResult`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `WorkspaceListUsagesResult`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `WorkspacePurgeBody`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `WorkspacePurgeBodyFilters`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `WorkspacePurgeClient`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `WorkspacePurgeResponse`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `WorkspacePurgeStatusResponse`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 446 additive change(s).
      info	[Changelog]
    • ️✔️operationalinsights/mgmt/2020-08-01/operationalinsights [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - Struct `ClusterErrorResponse` has been removed
      info	[Changelog] - Struct `DataExportErrorResponse` has been removed
      info	[Changelog] - Struct `ErrorContract` has been removed
      info	[Changelog] - Field `Target` of struct `ErrorResponse` has been removed
      info	[Changelog] - Field `Details` of struct `ErrorResponse` has been removed
      info	[Changelog] - Field `AdditionalInfo` of struct `ErrorResponse` has been removed
      info	[Changelog] - Field `Code` of struct `ErrorResponse` has been removed
      info	[Changelog] - Field `Message` of struct `ErrorResponse` has been removed
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] ### New Content
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `ErrorDetail`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Error` in struct `ErrorResponse`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 7 breaking change(s), 3 additive change(s).
      info	[Changelog]
    • ️✔️operationalinsights/mgmt/2015-03-20/operationalinsights [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️preview/operationalinsights/mgmt/2020-03-01-preview/operationalinsights [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️preview/operationalinsights/mgmt/2015-11-01-preview/operationalinsights [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 33ffbed. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	autorest --version=V2 --typescript --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION [email protected]/[email protected] --typescript-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/operationalinsights/resource-manager/readme.md
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-operationalinsights [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[npmPack] loaded rollup.config.js with warnings
      cmderr	[npmPack] (!) Unused external imports
      cmderr	[npmPack] default imported from external module 'rollup' but never used
      cmderr	[npmPack] ./esm/operationalInsightsManagementClient.js → ./dist/arm-operationalinsights.js...
      cmderr	[npmPack] created ./dist/arm-operationalinsights.js in 577ms
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 33ffbed. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      warn	No file changes detected after generation
      warn	No package detected after generation
    ️️✔️ azure-resource-manager-schemas succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 33ffbed. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	npx n 12
      command	autorest --use=@autorest/[email protected] --version=3.0.6374 --azureresourceschema --multiapi --title=none --pass-thru:subset-reducer --azureresourceschema-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/azure-resource-manager-schemas ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/operationalinsights/resource-manager/readme.md
    • ️✔️operationalinsights [View full logs]  [Release Schema Changes]
      cmderr	[resource-manager] node-pre-gyp
      cmderr	[resource-manager] WARN Using request for node-pre-gyp https download
      cmderr	[resource-manager] npm WARN [email protected] No repository field.
      cmderr	[resource-manager] npm WARN optional SKIPPING OPTIONAL DEPENDENCY: [email protected] (node_modules/fsevents):
      cmderr	[resource-manager] npm WARN notsup SKIPPING OPTIONAL DEPENDENCY: Unsupported platform for [email protected]: wanted {"os":"darwin","arch":"any"} (current: {"os":"linux","arch":"x64"})
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 33ffbed. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-23 23:09:10 INFO [VERSION][Found] current version "com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-loganalytics;1.0.0-beta.1;1.0.0-beta.2"
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-23 23:09:10 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find stable version, current version "1.0.0-beta.2"
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-23 23:09:10 INFO autorest --version=3.0.6369 --use=@autorest/[email protected] --java.azure-libraries-for-java-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java --java.output-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java/sdk/loganalytics/azure-resourcemanager-loganalytics --java.namespace=com.azure.resourcemanager.loganalytics   --java --pipeline.modelerfour.additional-checks=false --pipeline.modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication=true --azure-arm --verbose --sdk-integration --fluent=lite --java.fluent=lite --java.license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_SMALL ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/operationalinsights/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-23 23:09:53 INFO [CI][Skip] ci.yml already has module azure-resourcemanager-loganalytics
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-23 23:09:53 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with pom.xml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-23 23:09:53 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module azure-resourcemanager-loganalytics
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-23 23:09:53 INFO [POM][Success] Write to pom.xml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-23 23:09:53 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with root pom
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-23 23:09:53 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module sdk/loganalytics
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-23 23:09:53 INFO [POM][Success] Write to root pom
    • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-loganalytics [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-23 23:12:42 DEBUG Got artifact_id: azure-resourcemanager-loganalytics
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-23 23:12:42 DEBUG Got artifact: pom.xml
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-23 23:12:42 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-loganalytics-1.0.0-beta.2-sources.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-23 23:12:42 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-loganalytics-1.0.0-beta.2.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-23 23:12:42 DEBUG Match jar package: azure-resourcemanager-loganalytics-1.0.0-beta.2.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-23 23:12:42 DEBUG output: {"full": "```sh\ncurl -L \"https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/13012/azure-sdk-for-java/azure-resourcemanager-loganalytics/azure-resourcemanager-loganalytics-1.0.0-beta.2.jar\" -o azure-resourcemanager-loganalytics-1.0.0-beta.2.jar\nmvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.azure.resourcemanager -DartifactId=azure-resourcemanager-loganalytics -Dversion=1.0.0-beta.0 -Dfile=azure-resourcemanager-loganalytics-1.0.0-beta.2.jar -Dpackaging=jar -DgeneratePom=true
      ```"}
    ️🔄[Staging] ApiDocPreview inProgress [Detail]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @dabenhamMic, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff.

    TaskHow to fixPrioritySupport (Microsoft alias)
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHighruowan
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHighraychen, jianyxi
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHighraychen,jianyxi
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhighjianyxi, ruoxuan
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback."

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @dabenhamMic, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.

    @markcowl markcowl closed this Feb 17, 2021
    @markcowl markcowl reopened this Feb 17, 2021
    @markcowl
    Copy link
    Member

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

    @dabenhamMic
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    @markcowl we have changed the contract from custom definition error response to common ErrorResponse.
    this was done in order to pass the validation tests and generate a new SDK for Microsoft.OperationalInsights.

    @markcowl
    Copy link
    Member

    @dabenhamMic Was this done in response to an s360 issue on swagger correctness or completeness? If so, link it here, and we may be able to approve without the breaking chaneg review.

    Otherwise, breaking change review is required, even for 'good' changes. 'good' changes may be approved.

    @ArcturusZhang
    Copy link
    Member

    Hi @akning-ms could you help on this breaking change warning? This PR only replace the self-defined error model with the error model defined in common-types, which is not really a breaking change, I suppose.

    @akning-ms
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi @akning-ms could you help on this breaking change warning? This PR only replace the self-defined error model with the error model defined in common-types, which is not really a breaking change, I suppose.

    Yes. looks a false alarm. it is due to a extra type: object in old version. + @jianyexi for awareness

    @jianyexi
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Hi @akning-ms

            Arthur Ning
            FTE could you help on this breaking change warning? This PR only replace the self-defined error model with the error model defined in common-types, which is not really a breaking change, I suppose.
    

    Yes. looks a false alarm. it is due to a extra type: object in old version. + @jianyexi Jianye Xi FTE for awareness

    Agreed, this change has no impact, can be approved safely.

    @dabenhamMic
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    @markcowl , @jianyexi , can one of you guys please approve and merge this pr?

    @markcowl
    Copy link
    Member

    markcowl commented Feb 23, 2021

    @jianyexi Change from a locally defined schema to the common schema automatically changes types in any strongly typed language SDK. This may have been done for good reason, but it is a breaking change in the api definition

    @JeffreyRichter JeffreyRichter added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Feb 23, 2021
    @jianyexi
    Copy link
    Contributor

    jianyexi commented Feb 24, 2021

    @jianyexi Jianye Xi FTE Change from a locally defined schema to the common schema automatically changes types in any strongly typed language SDK. This may have been done for good reason, but it is a breaking change in the api definition

    Since the autorest modeler4 can auto-corrected the undefined type to "'type:object'" , and the model name and its definition are not changed, why there are breaking change ? The SDK generation even don't know this change 's happen .

    mkarmark pushed a commit to mkarmark/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2021
    * updated ErrorResponse in DataExport and OperationStatuses
    
    * removed whitespace
    
    * fixed ErrorResponse in Cluster 2020-08-01
    
    * ErrorResponse in Tables.json 2020-08-01
    
    * changed min retention of TablesList to 30 from 7
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 CI-BreakingChange-Go
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    6 participants