Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.Cache to add version preview/2021-02-01-preview #13051

Conversation

joroda
Copy link
Contributor

@joroda joroda commented Feb 19, 2021

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.

Changelog

Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When you are targeting to deploy new service/feature to public regions? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
    3/1/2021
  3. When you expect to publish swagger? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
    3/1/2021
  4. If it's an update to existing version, please select SDKs of specific language and CLIs that require refresh after swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No, no need to refresh for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.

    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
    • Adding a new service
  • Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in stable version
  • Removing properties in stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in stable version
  • Updating API in stable version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in preview over 1 year

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @joroda Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 19, 2021

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for LintDiff.

    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️⚠️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version): 22 Warnings warning [Detail] Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ 1008 - ModifiedOperationId The operation id has been changed from 'Get_OperationStatus' to 'OperationsStatus_Get'. This will impact generated code.
    New: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2021-02-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L69:7
    Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2020-10-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L72:7
    ⚠️ 1008 - ModifiedOperationId The operation id has been changed from 'PrivateLinkResources_ListByRedisEnterpriseCache' to 'PrivateLinkResources_ListByCluster'. This will impact generated code.
    New: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2021-02-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L1085:7
    Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2020-10-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L1085:7
    ⚠️ 1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2021-02-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L134:9
    Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2020-10-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L137:9
    ⚠️ 1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2021-02-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L193:9
    Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2020-10-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L196:9
    ⚠️ 1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2021-02-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L249:9
    Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2020-10-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L252:9
    ⚠️ 1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2021-02-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L292:9
    Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2020-10-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L295:9
    ⚠️ 1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2021-02-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L334:9
    Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2020-10-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L337:9
    ⚠️ 1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2021-02-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L416:9
    Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2020-10-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L419:9
    ⚠️ 1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2021-02-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L469:9
    Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2020-10-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L469:9
    ⚠️ 1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2021-02-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L532:9
    Old: Microsoft.Cache/preview/2020-10-01-preview/redisenterprise.json#L532:9
    ️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.

    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation: 33 Warnings warning [Detail] Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"redisenterprise/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-02",
    "details":"The schema 'Sku' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"redisenterprise/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-02",
    "details":"The schema 'Cluster' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"redisenterprise/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-02",
    "details":"The schema 'ClusterUpdate' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"redisenterprise/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-02",
    "details":"The schema 'ClusterProperties' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"redisenterprise/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-02",
    "details":"The schema 'ClusterList' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"redisenterprise/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-02",
    "details":"The schema 'Database' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"redisenterprise/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-02",
    "details":"The schema 'DatabaseUpdate' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"redisenterprise/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-02",
    "details":"The schema 'DatabaseProperties' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"redisenterprise/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-02",
    "details":"The schema 'DatabaseList' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"redisenterprise/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-preview-2021-02",
    "details":"The schema 'Persistence' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 19, 2021

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️🔄 $(sdkName) inProgress [Detail]
    ️🔄[Staging] ApiDocPreview inProgress [Detail]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @joroda, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff.

    TaskHow to fixPrioritySupport (Microsoft alias)
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHighruowan
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHighraychen, jianyxi
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHighraychen,jianyxi
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhighjianyxi, ruoxuan
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback."

    @joroda
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    joroda commented Feb 19, 2021

    /azp run unifiedPipeline

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

    @joroda joroda force-pushed the dev-redisenterprise-Microsoft.Cache-2021-02-01-preview branch from 0f753dd to 1cb3287 Compare February 19, 2021 03:56
    @joroda joroda marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2021 04:06
    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Feb 19, 2021
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @joroda your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board([email protected]). cc @chunyu3

    @chunyu3 chunyu3 self-requested a review February 20, 2021 00:56
    @RamyasreeChakka RamyasreeChakka added the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Feb 22, 2021
    @RamyasreeChakka RamyasreeChakka added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Feb 23, 2021
    @chunyu3 chunyu3 merged commit 64d1751 into Azure:master Feb 23, 2021
    mkarmark pushed a commit to mkarmark/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2021
    …view/2021-02-01-preview (Azure#13051)
    
    * Adds base for updating Microsoft.Cache from version stable/2021-03-01 to version 2021-02-01-preview
    
    * Updates readme
    
    * Updates API version in new specs and examples
    
    * Add 2021-02-01-preview API version to redisenterprise
    
    * Fix RedisEnterpriseDatabasesForceUnlink example to include Azure-AsyncOperation header but not Location header
    
    * Various naming and casing fixes for Redis Enterprise geo replication feature
    
    * Update RedisEnterpriseDatabasesCreateWithGeoReplication example
    
    * Fix description for response to Microsoft.Cache/redisEnterprise/databases/forceUnlink action
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    5 participants