Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update cSpell.json. Add exception for "Criterias" #26645

Conversation

sagamzu
Copy link
Contributor

@sagamzu sagamzu commented Nov 9, 2023

ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request

PR review workflow diagram

Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.

diagram

[1] ARM review queue (for merge queues, see [4])
The PRs are processed by time opened, ascending. Your PR may show up on 2nd or later page.
If you addressed Step 1 from the diagram and your PR is not showing up in the queue, ensure the label ARMChangesRequested
is removed from your PR. This should cause the label WaitForARMFeedback to be added.
[2] https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel
[3] List of SDK breaking changes approvers in pinned Teams announcement
[4] public repo merge queue, private repo merge queue (for ARM review queue, [1])

If you need further help with anything, see Getting help section below.

Purpose of this PR

What's the purpose of this PR? Check all that apply. This is mandatory!

  • New API version. (Such PR should have been generated with OpenAPI Hub).
  • Update existing version for a new feature. (This is applicable only when you are revising a private preview API version.)
  • Update existing version to fix swagger quality issues in S360.
  • Other, please clarify:
    • edit this with your clarification

Due diligence checklist

To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:

Breaking changes review (Step 1)

  • If the automation determines you have breaking changes, i.e. Step 1 from the diagram applies to you,
    you must follow the breaking changes process.
    IMPORTANT This applies even if:
    • The tool fails while it shouldn't, e.g. due to runtime exception, or incorrect detection of breaking changes.
    • You believe there is no need for you to request breaking change approval, for any reason.
      Such claims must be reviewed, and the process is the same.

ARM API changes review (Step 2)

  • If this PR is in purview of ARM review then automation will add the ARMReview label.
  • If you want to force ARM review, add the label yourself.
  • Proceed according to the diagram at the top of this comment.

Viewing API changes

For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table
in the Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.

Suppressing failures

If one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR, please follow the
Swagger-Suppression-Process
to get approval.

Getting help

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Nov 9, 2023

Next Steps to Merge

✔️ All automated merging requirements have been met! Refer to step 4 in the PR workflow diagram (even if your PR is for data plane, not ARM).

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Nov 9, 2023

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for LintDiff.
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Nov 9, 2023

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Breaking Changes Tracking

Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

Copy link

Swagger pipeline started successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment.

@xuhumsft xuhumsft added WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required MergeRequested labels Nov 9, 2023
@zizw123 zizw123 removed MergeRequested WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Nov 9, 2023
@zizw123
Copy link

zizw123 commented Nov 9, 2023

This change shouldn't require ARM review, let me know if you are blocked without ARM sign off

@sagamzu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sagamzu commented Nov 10, 2023

This change shouldn't require ARM review, let me know if you are blocked without ARM sign off

@zizw123 I need to get approval for this PR. I can t=merge it

@sagamzu
Copy link
Contributor Author

sagamzu commented Nov 10, 2023

@eatkimchee can you please review+merge this PR?

@xuhumsft
Copy link
Member

This change shouldn't require ARM review, let me know if you are blocked without ARM sign off

@zizw123 please let us know how we can get the ARMSignOff label. I will add the mergeRequested label then.

@sagamzu sagamzu merged commit 731fecd into release-release-Sentinel-securityinsights-Microsoft.SecurityInsights-2023-10-01-preview Nov 14, 2023
27 checks passed
@sagamzu sagamzu deleted the sagamzu-patch-1 branch November 14, 2023 18:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants