Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create new preview branch and bump version #7388

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Oct 8, 2019

Conversation

pgmisc
Copy link
Contributor

@pgmisc pgmisc commented Oct 2, 2019

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Oct 2, 2019

In Testing, Please Ignore

[Logs] (Generated from 631b056, Iteration 10)

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Oct 2, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-python

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Oct 2, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@lirenhe lirenhe added WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required APIStewardshipBoard-ReviewRequested This should be reviewed by the Azure API Stewardship team in partnership with the service team. and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required APIStewardshipBoard-ReviewRequested This should be reviewed by the Azure API Stewardship team in partnership with the service team. labels Oct 7, 2019
@pgmisc
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgmisc commented Oct 7, 2019

We have one model validation error with an example file. Currently there is no way to represent a file stream under a response body for x-ms-examples. This is a known issue from a previous release, not introduced as part of this version. Please approve this PR.

@lirenhe lirenhe removed the APIStewardshipBoard-ReviewRequested This should be reviewed by the Azure API Stewardship team in partnership with the service team. label Oct 8, 2019
@lirenhe lirenhe merged commit ac46803 into Azure:master Oct 8, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants