Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Azure Cognitive Search] Rename Track 2 models and add missing property #7936

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2019

Conversation

brjohnstmsft
Copy link
Member

Per Azure API review feedback, we're renaming some Result types from <model><operation>Result to <operation><model>Result.

Also, the @search.coverage property of AutocompleteResult was missing from the spec. Note that it's not actually supported by the service yet, but will be added in the near future.

FYI @jhendrixMSFT -- This applies to our Track 2 specs only, and our first Track 2 SDK has not shipped yet, so this won't actually break any customers.

FYI @JonathanGiles -- Please review and let me know if the names make sense from an API guidelines perspective.

FYI @navalev @itye-msft -- Please ensure these changes are reflected correctly in the generated Java SDK code.

FYI @arv100kri @bleroy -- Just making sure you're aware of these changes for Track 2.

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

Per Azure API review feedback, we're renaming some Result types from
<model><operation>Result to <operation><model>Result.

Also, the @search.coverage property of AutocompleteResult was missing from
the spec. Note that it's not actually supported by the service yet, but will
be added in the near future.
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 10, 2019

azure-sdk-for-java - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 10, 2019

azure-sdk-for-net - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 10, 2019

azure-sdk-for-js - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 10, 2019

azure-sdk-for-go - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 10, 2019

azure-sdk-for-python - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@jhendrixMSFT jhendrixMSFT assigned jhendrixMSFT and unassigned mayurid Dec 11, 2019
@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

@brjohnstmsft are we still waiting for reviews from others?

@brjohnstmsft
Copy link
Member Author

@jhendrixMSFT Nope, this is ready to merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants