-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added Swagger for some New API related to Private Endpoint work #8587
Conversation
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
azure-sdk-for-go - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-net - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-js - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-java - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-python - Release
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Hi deymadhumanti Not sure whether your PR is ready for review as there is some validation error to fix. if not ready, you can put lable 'NotReadyForReview' until it is ready. Thanks |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
} | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"/Subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.RecoveryServices/vaults/{vaultName}/privateEndpointConnections/{privateEndpointConnectionName}/operationsStatus/{operationId}": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please see
https://armwiki.azurewebsites.net/rp_onboarding/process/api_review_best_practices.html#common-issues-found-in-review
"Operation results as a child resource"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this apply for operationStatus as well ? Also, this is the pattern we used for all other async operations in recovery services. Can we keep this consistent to existing async apis?
"application/json" | ||
], | ||
"paths": { | ||
"/Subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.RecoveryServices/vaults/{vaultName}/privateEndpointConnections/{privateEndpointConnectionName}": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please include a "list" API for privateEndpointConnections
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes we need to add, since vault properties has the list already. That is the way portal/private link center will call. List was just an auxillary api. Given we had to deliver on tight deadlines, we added min set. We have this as action item and will do it post this release. Will that work?
List API will be added shortly, and I've recommended a pattern to follow going forwards for async operations. Signing off on this change. |
azure-cli-extensions - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
…e#8587) * Added a new Package version for private endpoint related API * Resolved PR comments * deleted capital BMS.json * Fixed PR validation failures * deleted request body from json * Added swagger for Get and List PrivateLinkResource API * Resolved Model validation failures as part of PR validation * Fixed LintDiff validation * Fixed SpellCheck validation * undoing RRP side changes * Want to Run Python SDK * Fixed PrettierCheck failures Co-authored-by: deymadhumanti <[email protected]>
Latest improvements:
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Contribution checklist:
ARM API Review Checklist
Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.
Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.