Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ReleasePR recoveryservices/mgmt/2020-02-02] Azure Backup Heath Update #9910

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[ReleasePR recoveryservices/mgmt/2020-02-02] Azure Backup Heath Update #9910

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

openapi-sdkautomation[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Created to release recoveryservices/mgmt/2020-02-02.Reopen this PR to release the SDK.
If you can't reopen it, click here to create a new one.

Installation Instructions

You can install the package recoveryservices/mgmt/2020-02-02 of this PR by downloading the package and extracting it to the root of your azure-sdk-for-go directory.

Direct Download

The generated package can be directly downloaded from here:

Update bms.json

Azure Backup Health
azure-sdk referenced this pull request in azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-go Dec 8, 2022
[Hub Generated] Publish private branch 'ssivathas/Microsoft.MobileNetwork-2022-11-01' (Azure#21752)

* add or modify files

* Use "5Qi" as the schema to define Default QoS Flow 5G QoS Indicator value. (#9817)

On SIM policy we use the 'Default QoS Flow 5G QoS Indicator value', we were incorrectly using the '5QiPriorityLevel' schema (which is an interger between 1 and 127 as per https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/blob/RPSaaSMaster/specification/mobilenetwork/resource-manager/Microsoft.MobileNetwork/stable/2022-11-01/ts29571.json#L117. We should have used 5Qi - an integer between 0 and 255. We made a mistake when we first p ut this in and have no spotted it.

Even though changing the allowed values for a property is a breaking change, we think this is acceptable because:
1) This is our first stable API, there is no pre-existing stable API we need to be back-compatible with
2) 2022-04-01-preview to 2022-11-01 already contains breaking changes that we have discussed in https://eng.ms/docs/strategic-missions-and-technologies/strategic-missions-and-technologies-organization/azure-for-operators/packet-core/private-mobile-network/azure-private-5g-core/cross-team/releases/2022-11-01-arm-api/back-compatibility
3) We have one customer who may need to use values 128-255 -> if that customer does PUTs with the 2022-11-01 API then a GET with the 2022-04-01, it will fail, while this is sad, we think this is an acceptable risk.

* Update ICCID definition to support shorter ICCID (#9910)

GSM 11.1 Version 8 has been replaced by 3GPP TS 11.11, which itself has been replaced by 3GPP TS 102.211 Rel 16, and all of them share the same information for the definition of ICCID.

ISO/IEC 7812-1 2017, ITU-T E.118 - 05/2006 and 3GPP TS 102.211 all alllow ICCID/Primary Account Numbers which are shorter than 19 digits.

While ISO/IEC 7812-1 2017 and ITU-T E.118 - 05/2006 both require a maximum number of digits of 19, and GSM 11.11 is clear than 20 digits ICCID are allowed to be grandfathered in.

ITU-T E.118 - 05/2006 mandates that all new SIM cards use a prefix of 89, but allows 66 as a transitional mechanism for older SIM cards.

ISO/IEC 7812-1 2017 mandates a minimum length of 10 digits. No other specification comments on a minimum size, so we go with this.

The original validation was based on an incorrect reading of the specs, where 19 and 20 were assumed to be the only valid lengths, and the comment on the transitional mechanism was missed.

Even though changing the allowed values for a property is a breaking change, we think this is acceptable because:

1) This is our first stable API, there is no pre-existing stable API we need to be back-compatible with

2) 2022-04-01-preview to 2022-11-01 already contains breaking changes that we have discussed in https://eng.ms/docs/strategic-missions-and-technologies/strategic-missions-and-technologies-organization/azure-for-operators/packet-core/private-mobile-network/azure-private-5g-core/cross-team/releases/2022-11-01-arm-api/back-compatibility

3) We have customers who are currently blocked and having to work around this restriction, and it's acceptable for them to be unable to resubmit the data on the old API.

4) This is relaxing the restriction on a optional field, so the impact of this change is restricted anyway.

5) Not making this change leaves the product ill defined for ever.

* Remove reference to 2021-04-01-preview API in readme

* Fix python output-folder

* Update readme.python.md

Co-authored-by: Richard Whitehouse <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Lee <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yuchao Yan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants