-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Supporting sparse the test parameters #10312
Conversation
/azp run java - keyvault - tests |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run java - search - tests |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run java - keyvault - tests |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run java - search- tests |
No pipelines are associated with this pull request. |
/azp run java - appconfiguration - tests |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run java - search - tests |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
System.out.println(httpClient); | ||
System.out.println(serviceVersion); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
System.out.println(httpClient); | |
System.out.println(serviceVersion); | |
System.out.printf("HttpClient is %s; Service Version is %s", httpClient, serviceVersion); |
/azp run java - keyvault - tests |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Right now, it is able to display the right name from Test tab. |
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId> | ||
<version>3.0.0-M4</version> <!-- {x-version-update;org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin;external_dependency} --> | ||
<configuration> | ||
<rerunFailingTestsCount>3</rerunFailingTestsCount> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally we don't want to be retrying failing tests as this could mask flakiness in our clients.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, will remove.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - Thanks for switching to this approach.
The PR is to sparse the httpclient to matrix.
Test over four scenarios: