Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding perf improvements for ObjectNode mapping #18859

Conversation

FabianMeiswinkel
Copy link
Member

This is the possible perf improvement I found when working on the Retriable Write prototype

Also added a Perf test to proof that it actually improves throughput :-)

@FabianMeiswinkel
Copy link
Member Author

Perf results

@@ -1211,6 +1211,8 @@ private void addPartitionKeyInformation(RxDocumentServiceRequest request,
InternalObjectNode internalObjectNode;
if (objectDoc instanceof InternalObjectNode) {
internalObjectNode = (InternalObjectNode) objectDoc;
} else if (objectDoc instanceof ObjectNode) {
internalObjectNode = new InternalObjectNode((ObjectNode)objectDoc);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we would like to move away from the notion of InternalObjectNode and delete this class altogether.

Currently InternalObjectNode is not used in the Point read/write. It is only used in the CFP code path.

With this change we are adding more dependency on InternalObjectNode

can we do the other way around and replace InternalObjectNode with ObjectNode?

@moderakh moderakh self-requested a review January 28, 2021 20:49
Copy link
Contributor

@moderakh moderakh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as a future improvement we should kill InternalObjectNode.
can happen later after this PR.

@FabianMeiswinkel FabianMeiswinkel merged commit 49446fe into Azure:master Jan 29, 2021
azure-sdk pushed a commit to azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants