Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Storage ARM Template for live tests #7313

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 9, 2020
Merged

Storage ARM Template for live tests #7313

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 9, 2020

Conversation

hemanttanwar
Copy link
Contributor

Our goal is to create common Azure resources using ARM template for each module. And pipeline to manage common resources and drop them in end. This will save cost and remove unwanted resources after test is complete or stopped in between
Storage will have one common arm template for Queue, File and Blob.
The pipeline will run ARM template and create common resources for example resource group, Accounts etc.
The pipeline will pass on names of these resources as ENV variable into test. For example PRIMARY_STORAGE_ACCOUNT_NAME
In the end pipeline will also delete these common resources which it created earlier and that will cause all the resources created to be removed.

@hemanttanwar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run java - storage - tests

@hemanttanwar hemanttanwar requested review from alzimmermsft and removed request for alzimmermsft January 9, 2020 18:37
sdk/storage/tests.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/storage/tests.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/storage/tests.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@hemanttanwar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run java - storage - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@hemanttanwar hemanttanwar merged commit 49ade3d into Azure:master Jan 9, 2020
@hemanttanwar hemanttanwar deleted the storage-arm-template-for-test branch January 9, 2020 21:46
PROVISIONER_APPLICATION_ID: $(provisioner-aad-id)
PROVISIONER_APPLICATION_SECRET: $(provisioner-aad-secret)
displayName: Remove Test Resources
condition: true
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@danieljurek: Should this be condition: always() instead? Or are these equivalent? I assume the intent is to ensure cleanup is always run regardless of earlier failures.

@mitchdenny
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR might have broken the Cosmos build

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants