Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automatic rush update #15839

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2021
Merged

Conversation

azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

Automatic rush update PR

@@ -1378,7 +1378,7 @@ packages:
/@types/body-parser/1.19.0:
dependencies:
'@types/connect': 3.4.34
'@types/node': 8.10.66
'@types/node': 15.12.2
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The @types/node version keeps changing based on whose machine the rush update PRs usually come from. Anybody know the mystery here? Or is ti just dependent on the version of node on the PR author's machine?

cc @xirzec, @chradek

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, it should not be dependent on the version of node on the author's machine because that doesn't have any influence on the types.

My pet theory was that the author may have inadvertently pulled in a new version while working in the repo across branches, but this is presumably happening now from freshly cloning the repo!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I propose we go with this change and then wait and watch what happens next :)

Assuming we will have automated PRs going forward, it should stay the same

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like some transitive dependencies are pulling it in? I'm fine approving this for now

@praveenkuttappan
Copy link
Member

/check-enforcer evaluate

@praveenkuttappan
Copy link
Member

/check-enforcer reset

@praveenkuttappan
Copy link
Member

/check-enforcer evaluate

@praveenkuttappan
Copy link
Member

/check-enforcer override

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants