Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release v0.11.0 beta 9 #106

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Release v0.11.0 beta 9 #106

wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

dr-orlovsky
Copy link
Member

@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky commented Oct 13, 2024

@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky added this to the v0.11.0 milestone Oct 13, 2024
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky self-assigned this Oct 13, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 13, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 21 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 42.1%. Comparing base (f2bbab6) to head (0f591b4).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
consensus/src/timelocks.rs 0.0% 12 Missing ⚠️
dbc/src/anchor.rs 0.0% 4 Missing ⚠️
consensus/src/tx.rs 0.0% 3 Missing ⚠️
dbc/src/opret/mod.rs 0.0% 1 Missing ⚠️
dbc/src/tapret/mod.rs 0.0% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #106     +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage    42.2%   42.1%   -0.1%     
========================================
  Files          35      35             
  Lines        3514    3521      +7     
========================================
  Hits         1483    1483             
- Misses       2031    2038      +7     
Flag Coverage Δ
rust 42.1% <0.0%> (-0.1%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

fmt keeps changing all the time. Now they introduced new "editions" feature, which by default does a lot of changes to the codebase by mingling with alphabetical sorting of all imports, doing them in case-insentive way. This PR allows to avoid that dramatic changes
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky marked this pull request as ready for review October 13, 2024 09:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant