set up datum size for WindowDataLayer #1091
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@ronghanghu could you check out my PR #1070 which I think it also fix this problem. |
|
@sguada I agree, but I'll merge this since it's a 6 line change that makes WindowDataLayer usable in the short term -- let me also take a look at your PR though. Thanks for the fix @ronghanghu. |
jeffdonahue
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2014
set up datum size for WindowDataLayer
mitmul
pushed a commit
to mitmul/caffe
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2014
set up datum size for WindowDataLayer
RazvanRanca
pushed a commit
to RazvanRanca/caffe
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2014
set up datum size for WindowDataLayer
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
set up datum size for WindowDataLayer to adapt for the new BaseDataLayer inferface.
otherwise, WindowDataLayer fails due to #1089