Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rename feature names with ambiguity #98

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 29, 2023
Merged

rename feature names with ambiguity #98

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 29, 2023

Conversation

anilbey
Copy link
Contributor

@anilbey anilbey commented Aug 28, 2023

"All" is a neurite name and the code sometimes creates ambiguous English feature names.
E.g. while total axon area and total dendrite volume are fine, total all width and total all area are confusing.

This PR changes the naming convention as follows.

From "total {neurite_name} volume" to "total volume, {neurite_name}".

That results in more understandable feature names e.g.

  • total volume, axon
  • total volume, all

Copy link
Collaborator

@AurelienJaquier AurelienJaquier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

very nice!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #98 (709b08f) into main (adf8bac) will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #98      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.78%   75.73%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          51       51              
  Lines        4089     4089              
==========================================
- Hits         3099     3097       -2     
- Misses        990      992       +2     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
emodelrunner/factsheets/morphology_features.py 96.07% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@anilbey
Copy link
Contributor Author

anilbey commented Aug 29, 2023

Apparently build.os needs to be specified for the recent version of readthedocs

@anilbey anilbey merged commit ebc89db into main Aug 29, 2023
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants