-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: update for 2023 #29
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, main question is about NFS code that seemed to be removed
- uses: actions/checkout@v3 | ||
with: | ||
clean: false #this is to avoid permissions on self-hosted runner | ||
- name: Pre-check dirty dirs in self-hosted |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lets do this on another PR, but our self-hosted runners are now ephemeral and all of this checking/cleaning of files and directories can be removed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds great! Will add another PR to address this
name: gcr.io/jupyterhub-docker-images/jupyterhub-scipy | ||
tag: phys1600-spring2020 | ||
name: gcr.io/jupyterhub-docker-images/mpa2065 | ||
tag: latest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
best to use another tag that is more stable than latest, but fine for now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good 👍
@@ -67,12 +67,6 @@ module "shared-nfs" { | |||
|
|||
locals { | |||
helm_release_wait_condition = length(kubernetes_secret.tls_secret) > 0 ? kubernetes_secret.tls_secret[0].metadata[0].name : kubernetes_namespace.jhub.metadata[0].name |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hm - why did this nfs code change? We also could check this deployment, which is not part of the tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe I got rid of this for testing and somehow forgot to add it back? I will add it back and rerun the tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh @mirestrepo actually tflint complained that this is declared by unused. It was used in line 220 of this file, which was commented out, so I just removed it. Should be safe to leave out then?
What was updated: