-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rustls webpki test harness? #88
Comments
Hey @cpu, thanks for reaching out! I'd love to integrate (That being said, I may quickly build this out for funsies.)
Have you considered integrating this testsuite in-repo as well? That's what PyCA Cryptography is doing, and it's how we intended it to be used. If that sounds interesting to you, I'd be happy to help with that! For reference: here's the (WIP) harness that PyCA Cryptography is using to run x509-limbo in situ: |
Very fair! Thanks for considering it.
I hadn't, but that would be even better 👍 I haven't been following this work very closely and didn't realize it was amenable to that. I don't think I'll be able to find time to work on that in next week or so but I'll put it in my backlog for a rainy day. I appreciate the pointers and offer to help. |
Hi folks, great project 🔒 🔨
I saw that #80 added a test harness for
briansmith/webpki
. Would you be willing to do similar for rustls/webpki?The rustls project uses this fork instead of the original repository since Rustls v0.21.0. It has some capabilities not present in the original repository (like IP address subject support, and CRL based revocation checking).
We've invested in running other testing regimens like BetterTLS in-repo but are always keen for more coverage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: