Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow for multiple pairwise comparisons, within one run #31

Open
slsevilla opened this issue Nov 7, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Allow for multiple pairwise comparisons, within one run #31

slsevilla opened this issue Nov 7, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@slsevilla
Copy link
Contributor

Description of feature

Currently the pipeline allows for a single pairwise comparison (control vs treatment). Feature addition will allow for multiple comparisons to be made.

Current workflow

  • input sample_manifest (sample | fastq_1 | fastq_2 | treat_or_ctrl)
  • run pipeline N=1 with single control group, single contrast group

Proposed workflow

  • input project_manifest (sample | fastq_1 | fastq_2 | treat_or_ctrl | libraryID | groupID)
  • split project_manifest into N sample_manifests (sample | fastq_1 | fastq_2 | treat_or_ctrl), by groupID col
  • create nextflow.config files with updated information (IE libraryID from project_manifest)
  • run pipeline N=unique(groupID) with single control group, single contrast group
  • all results will go to the same dir structure

Needed features

  • add new project_manifest check
  • add module to create sample_manifests
  • add functionality in cruise wrapper to submit multiple runs
@slsevilla slsevilla added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 7, 2023
@kelly-sovacool
Copy link
Member

kelly-sovacool commented Nov 7, 2023

This proposal looks good! Only thing I would change is instead of having this logic handled by the wrapper, we can do it all in nextflow and not have to submit multiple pipeline runs.

@kelly-sovacool kelly-sovacool self-assigned this Nov 7, 2023
@slsevilla
Copy link
Contributor Author

Agreed - better plan!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants